2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of subject-specific model parameters for visco-elastic elements

Abstract: The determination of subject-specific model parameter values is necessary in order for a computer simulation model of human motion to be evaluated quantitatively. This study used an optimisation procedure along with a kinematically-driven simulation model of the contact phase in running jumps to determine the elastic parameters of segmental wobbling masses and the foot-ground interface. Kinetic and kinematic data were obtained on a running jump for height and a running jump for distance performed by an elite m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the matching simulation no violations of either angular momentum or anatomical constraints occurred. The horizontal stiffness parameter value at the heel and toe was 63% of the initial estimate taken from Wilson et al (2006) while the vertical stiffness parameter values were 69% and 99% of the initial estimates at the heel and toe respectively. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the matching simulation no violations of either angular momentum or anatomical constraints occurred. The horizontal stiffness parameter value at the heel and toe was 63% of the initial estimate taken from Wilson et al (2006) while the vertical stiffness parameter values were 69% and 99% of the initial estimates at the heel and toe respectively. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A common set of viscoelastic parameters representing the attachments of the wobbling masses and the foot-ground interface was determined for the three phases of the triple jump using an adaptation of the method of Wilson et al (2006). The simulation model was angle-driven using performance data and 27 parameters were varied using a simulated annealing algorithm (Corana et al, 1987) in order to minimise the difference between simulation and performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the recent descriptions of the STA (Andersen et al, 2012;Benoit et al, 2015;Dumas et al, 2015;Grimpampi et al, 2014) and to the wobbling mass models reported in the literature (Alonso et al, 2007;Bélaise et al, 2016;Challis and Pain, 2008;Gittoes et al, 2009;Gruber et al, 1998;Günther et al, 2003;McLean et al, 2003;Wilson et al, 2006), it was useful to retrieve the stiffness matrix corresponding only to the modes defining the marker-cluster geometrical rigid transformations and more specifically to the marker-cluster translations. This stiffness matrix was given by:…”
Section: Vvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the models of the literature include linear or non-linear springs attached to a wobbling mass that can translate (and eventually rotate) with respect to the bone (Alonso et al, 2007;Gittoes et al, 2006;Gruber et al, 1998;Günther et al, 2003;McLean et al, 2003;Pain and Challis, 2004;Wilson et al, 2006). Identification of the parameters of these wobbling mass models, based on the ground reaction forces, as well as sensitivity analyses have been widely performed (Alonso et al, 2007;Gittoes et al, 2009;Pain and Challis, 2004;Wilson et al, 2006). However, to the best of the author's knowledge, the estimation of the stiffness parameters from the displacements of the skin relative to the underling bone measured in vivo by intra-cortical pins has not been performed yet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%