2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of stress fields in the elastic lithosphere by methods based on stress orientations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore a 2D model reflecting driving forces applied at the AP boundary can be considered separately, while the complete 3D stress tensor can be obtained by superimposing the stresses caused by the rock weight and ice sheet load on the continental part of the plate. Gravitational potential energy differences which produce lateral body forces and have been recognised as an important source for intraplate stresses in AP, see Kreemer and Holt [15], in the elastic problem affect neither principal stress orientations nor deviatoric stresses if potential of body forces is approximated by harmonic function, as explained in Mukhamediev et al [16]. Lateral body forces caused by harmonic potential only influence the magnitudes of principal stresses by adding to them the same amount which can be different from point to point.…”
Section: Data and Assumptions Used In Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore a 2D model reflecting driving forces applied at the AP boundary can be considered separately, while the complete 3D stress tensor can be obtained by superimposing the stresses caused by the rock weight and ice sheet load on the continental part of the plate. Gravitational potential energy differences which produce lateral body forces and have been recognised as an important source for intraplate stresses in AP, see Kreemer and Holt [15], in the elastic problem affect neither principal stress orientations nor deviatoric stresses if potential of body forces is approximated by harmonic function, as explained in Mukhamediev et al [16]. Lateral body forces caused by harmonic potential only influence the magnitudes of principal stresses by adding to them the same amount which can be different from point to point.…”
Section: Data and Assumptions Used In Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its solution is non-unique: although stress trajectories can be found uniquely, stress magnitudes are determined with some degree of arbitrariness. This approach has been suggested in [11][12][13] and tested for plane elasticity.…”
Section: Global Reconstruction Of Stresses From Discrete Stress Orienmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This structure of the data makes it impossible to directly transfer the methods used in photoelasticity to the problem of stress identification in the lithosphere. Therefore special approaches have recently been developed in [4][5][6]. These approaches make use of mathematical theory of plane elasticity [7], where the mean stress and deviatoric stress functions are described by means of two holomorphic functions, complex potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper an example from photoelasticity for a beam under three point bending test is presented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach. It is further applied for geophysical data to study stresses in the Australian continent [4,5]. In these papers single plane domains have been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%