2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-018-0257-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Strength and Deformation Properties of Columnar Jointed Rock Mass Using Physical Model Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, at the middle lower part of the specimen, the fractured zone further develops and the fracturing is intensified. Lin et al (2018) studied the shape effect of CJRMs with transverse joints under uniaxial compression by the experimental tests and analyzed the strength anisotropy and fracture mode. But the progressive fracture process of their specimens was not presented, and the influence of confining pressure was not considered in their study.…”
Section: Analysis Of Shape Effect Of Cjbs With Transverse Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, at the middle lower part of the specimen, the fractured zone further develops and the fracturing is intensified. Lin et al (2018) studied the shape effect of CJRMs with transverse joints under uniaxial compression by the experimental tests and analyzed the strength anisotropy and fracture mode. But the progressive fracture process of their specimens was not presented, and the influence of confining pressure was not considered in their study.…”
Section: Analysis Of Shape Effect Of Cjbs With Transverse Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the AE characteristics underlying the fracture process of CJRMs were not studied. Lin et al (2018) analyzed the shape effect of CJRM specimens with transverse joints by laboratory physical experiments and obtained the curves of uniaxial compressive strengths (UCSs) with various shapes and column dip angles, but the energy evolution and the influence of lateral pressure were not considered. Overall, the physical tests have obtained valuable research results on the understanding of mechanical properties of CJRMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameters of columns are mainly in the range of 13-25 cm, and the aspect ratios are in the range of 2-5 [17]. Previous studies on the CJRM were mainly based on the regular 4P-and 6P-CJRM models shown in Figure 2a,b [16,23]. Que [24] proposed a 5P-CJRM model which has the structural characteristics of the above two regular models.…”
Section: Structural Characteristics Of the Cjrmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the failure mode of rock mass is mainly determined by the joint direction and step angle, and the joint dip angle is the parameter that has the greatest influence on the properties of rock mass. Lin et al [3] conducted uniaxial compression tests on physical model samples with different angles of columnar joints and analyzed the strength characteristics and deformation modulus of columnar jointed rock mass. Yang et al [4,5] analyzed the failure characteristics and crack propagation law of discontinuous jointed rock mass with holes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%