2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2018.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of stimulated reservoir volume and anisotropic permeability using analytical modelling of microseismic and hydraulic fracturing parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seismic diffusivity is typically estimated using expressions that track the location of the triggering front during fluid injection. For example, the expression rt=4πDt (where D is the diffusivity value being estimated) is very commonly used (Antonioli et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2012; Goebel et al., 2017; Goertz‐Allmann et al., 2017; Haffener et al., 2018; Hummel & Shapiro, 2012; Ingebritsen & Manning, 2010; Shapiro & Dinske, 2009a; Yong et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2019). However, it is more appropriate to use the analytical solution to linear pressure diffusion in a three dimensions in response to a point source of fluid since this approach incorporates physically meaningful parameters such as the fluid injection rate.…”
Section: Computational Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The seismic diffusivity is typically estimated using expressions that track the location of the triggering front during fluid injection. For example, the expression rt=4πDt (where D is the diffusivity value being estimated) is very commonly used (Antonioli et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2012; Goebel et al., 2017; Goertz‐Allmann et al., 2017; Haffener et al., 2018; Hummel & Shapiro, 2012; Ingebritsen & Manning, 2010; Shapiro & Dinske, 2009a; Yong et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2019). However, it is more appropriate to use the analytical solution to linear pressure diffusion in a three dimensions in response to a point source of fluid since this approach incorporates physically meaningful parameters such as the fluid injection rate.…”
Section: Computational Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies of IIS have previously indicated that tracking the location of the triggering front as observed in r ‐ t plots may produce reasonable estimates of the effective hydraulic diffusivity at the injection site, mostly using the approach described by Shapiro et al. (1997) (Antonioli et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2012; Delepine et al., 2004; Goebel et al., 2017; Goertz‐Allmann et al., 2017; Haffener et al., 2018; Hummel & Müller, 2009; Hummel & Shapiro, 2012, 2013; Improta et al., 2015; Ingebritsen & Manning, 2010; Rothert & Shapiro, 2003; Segall & Lu, 2015; Shapiro & Dinske, 2009a, 2009b; Shapiro & Müller, 1999; Shapiro et al., 2002; Yong et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2019). Although these previous studies have implicitly assumed that the seismic diffusivity is essentially equivalent to the effective hydraulic diffusivity, the numerical study presented here has clearly shown that these two quantities are likely distinct in heterogeneous domains.…”
Section: Case Study: Soultz‐sous‐forêtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fracture spacing, injection pressure, in-situ stress contrast, and natural fracture dip also affect the geometry of hydraulic fractures [29,30]. Reservoir geo-mechanical parameters and hydromechanical parameters affect the stimulated reservoir volume [31] and oil productivity [32]. And the geological mechanics and hydromechanical parameters of the barrier layer affects SRV, as well, in layered formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%