2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of steroid profile in hair by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods for extracting and concentrating the molecules of interest are often the subject of method developments. It is essential to compare their efficiencies for accurate extraction of the molecule(s) of interest and efficient elimination of the components of biological matrices (e.g., plasma, urine, or even saliva) at the same time [105,106]. The, sometimes minute, quantities of certain steroids require sufficient sensitivity to ensure detection in the range of pg/mL [104].…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods for extracting and concentrating the molecules of interest are often the subject of method developments. It is essential to compare their efficiencies for accurate extraction of the molecule(s) of interest and efficient elimination of the components of biological matrices (e.g., plasma, urine, or even saliva) at the same time [105,106]. The, sometimes minute, quantities of certain steroids require sufficient sensitivity to ensure detection in the range of pg/mL [104].…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Familiarity with the participant was significantly associated with the magnitude of absolute difference in hair progesterone concentrations between HOME and LAB samples (ΔHProg); however, the regression model was not significant (Table 5 ). HOME collection circumstances and layperson characteristics did not affect the association between HOME and LAB hair steroid concentrations (Tables 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Related to the differences in measurement sensitivity and accuracy between analysis methods, the two previous studies using immunoassays (Enge et al 2020 : intra-assay and inter-assay CV below 8%; Ouellet et al 2016 : intra-assay CV: 5.39%) reported slightly lower coefficients of variation (CVs) compared to LC–MS/MS in our study (cortisol: 8.7% and 12.6% for intra- and inter-assay CV, respectively). Although the CVs were considered acceptable for LC–MS/MS (Gomez-Gomez and Pozo 2020 ), the precision of the analysis method might have an impact on the estimation of values (measurement error), and in turn, may affect the correlation due to the within-individual variation. The within-individual variance in HCC might be further increased by possible deviations from the ideal site on the scalp (‘posterior vertex’) (Cooper et al 2012 ), as there is some evidence of lower intra-individual variations in HCC within the posterior vertex than within or between other collection regions (Li et al 2012 ; Sauve et al 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since hair grows about one centimeter per month (127), the selection of this segment implies that the level of chronic stress accumulated over the month prior to sampling can be identified. The analysis was carried out using a LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) validated method (128). From this analysis, 11 targeted compounds were quantified (see Table 3).…”
Section: Hair Sampling and Analysis Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%