2015
DOI: 10.31254/jmr.2015.1310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of stature from hand dimensions

Abstract: Background: Due to increase events of mass disaster and brutal murders, dismembered body parts are sent to postmortem examination every now and then. Determination of stature from dismembered body parts can play vital role for identification of person. This study can be helpful there to determine stature from Hand length and Hand breadth. Aims and Objectives: To derive Regression formula and multiplication factor to determine stature from Hand length and Hand breadth for population in and around Rajkot region … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Hossain Parash et al ( 2022) also found similar hand lengths in their study. This result did not match with Khancan et al ( 2010), Habib and Kamal (2010), Ishak et al (2012), Dey and Kapoor (2013), Moorthy and Zulkifly (2015), Varu et al (2016), Zulkifly et al (2018), Kim et al (2018), Asadujjaman( 2019) and, Romphothong and Traithepchanapai (2019) where the mean (±SD) value of the length of hand was higher than the result of the present study. The left hand's mean (±SD) length was 17.69(±1.05) centimetres.…”
Section: Comparison Between Males With Other Studiescontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hossain Parash et al ( 2022) also found similar hand lengths in their study. This result did not match with Khancan et al ( 2010), Habib and Kamal (2010), Ishak et al (2012), Dey and Kapoor (2013), Moorthy and Zulkifly (2015), Varu et al (2016), Zulkifly et al (2018), Kim et al (2018), Asadujjaman( 2019) and, Romphothong and Traithepchanapai (2019) where the mean (±SD) value of the length of hand was higher than the result of the present study. The left hand's mean (±SD) length was 17.69(±1.05) centimetres.…”
Section: Comparison Between Males With Other Studiescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The left hand's mean (±SD) length was 17.69(±1.05) centimetres. This value was similar to the value found by Varu et al (2016) andHossain Parash et al (2022). The left-hand length did not match with Khancan et al ( 2010), Habib and Kamal (2010), Ishak et al (2012), Dey and Kapoor (2013), Moorthy and Zulkifly (2015), Zulkifly et al (2018), Kim et al (2018), Asadujjaman( 2019) and, Romphothong and Traithepchanapai (2019) where the mean (±SD) value of the length of hand was higher than the result of the present study.…”
Section: Comparison Between Males With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Table-III and table-IV). Stature was found to correlate positively with arm span both in males and females in our study (r=0.993 in males and r=0.989 in females).-Similarly, observations were made by Patel et al where they found the highest correlation between stature and arm span (r=0.908) 15. …”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Though the regression formula and multiplication factor, both are useful to determine stature from hand dimensions, the regression formula measures stature more precisely than the multiplication factor. 15 We also determined the Pearson correlation coefficient to find the correlation between stature and arm span (…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some contemporary scholars have attempted to estimate body height by combining forearm and fist lengths, and have found that height assessment is a major cause of controversy and research in forensics and anthropology (Choudhary et al, 2014). Positive correlation have been found between body height and hand length in different populations and a regression coefficient has been offered (Varu et al, 2015), however, the regression formula in one population is not always unique to another population and studies indicate the need to study population specificity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%