2017
DOI: 10.24326/asphc.2017.5.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Size and Shape Features of Hazelnuts Using Multivariate Analysis

Abstract: Nut and kernel size, shape and some sensorial traits in ten hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars were evaluated using an objective procedure based on multivariate analysis in order to obtain an important value of these cultivars for growers, processing and consumers. Cultivars were compared with nuts and kernels of C. avellana L. and C. colurna L. Significant differences in all physical properties were found among the cultivars, and also among cultivars and hazelnut species. A high correlation was found am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nuts of small and medium sizes with a nut weight of up to 3.2 g and crisp kernels are preferred for the kernel market, while for the in-shell market, larger, attractive nuts are considered the most favorable [27]. Although the investigated hazelnut cultivars were characterized by a greater average nut mass, the average kernel mass was quite similar to results obtained by Ozdemir and Akinci [28], where this trait in Turkish hazelnut cultivars was varied from 0.89 g to 1.33 g. All six hazelnut cultivars showed diameters greater than 20 mm, which may be considered suitable for market use, indicated per previously conducted studies [16]. The current study is consistent with Solar and Stampar [29] who noted that cultivars with nut diameters between 15.66 mm and 20.25 mm may be considered suitable for table consumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nuts of small and medium sizes with a nut weight of up to 3.2 g and crisp kernels are preferred for the kernel market, while for the in-shell market, larger, attractive nuts are considered the most favorable [27]. Although the investigated hazelnut cultivars were characterized by a greater average nut mass, the average kernel mass was quite similar to results obtained by Ozdemir and Akinci [28], where this trait in Turkish hazelnut cultivars was varied from 0.89 g to 1.33 g. All six hazelnut cultivars showed diameters greater than 20 mm, which may be considered suitable for market use, indicated per previously conducted studies [16]. The current study is consistent with Solar and Stampar [29] who noted that cultivars with nut diameters between 15.66 mm and 20.25 mm may be considered suitable for table consumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…To determine the total ash content, preweighted samples were placed in an oven at 525 • C until they had completely turned to ash, which was then weighed [19]. The carbohydrate content was estimated by subtracting the sum of the other components using the following formula [16]: carbohydrate content (%) = 100% − (% moisture + % protein + % fat + % ash)…”
Section: Kernel Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After this step, the polar (L), suture (W), and equatorial (T) diameters ( Figure 1) of each apple were measured using a digital vernier caliper (Athol, MA, USA). The measurement of these three dimensions allowed the calculation of the following parameters [40,41].…”
Section: Determination Of the Size And Shape Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. The measurement of these three dimensions allowed the calculation of the following parameters [40,41]. The elongation E (Equation (1)):…”
Section: Determination Of the Size And Shape Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%