2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-116831/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Significant Prognostic Factors for Maxillary Gingival Squamous Cell Carcinoma in 90 Cases

Abstract: BackgroundMaxillary gingival squamous cell carcinoma (MGSCC) occurs rather infrequently, compared to tongue and mandibular gingival carcinomas, among the cancers of the oral cavity. Therefore, significant numbers of MGSCC cases have not been statistically analysed. The aim of this study is to clarify the prognostic factors for MGSCC. MethodsWe performed the statistical analysis of 90 MGSCC cases primarily treated in our department from 1999 to 2014. ConclusionsThe patients (male: 36, female: 54) were aged betw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An overview of all the included studies and their characteristics is presented in Table 1 [2,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. All 20 included studies were observational.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…An overview of all the included studies and their characteristics is presented in Table 1 [2,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. All 20 included studies were observational.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine different treatment modalities were reported: 748/1185 (63%) patients had surgery only, 277/1185 (23%) had surgery with postoperative radiotherapy, 51/1185 (4%) had surgery with postoperative (chemo)radiotherapy, 40/1185 (3%) had preoperative intra-arterial chemotherapy with radiotherapy and surgery, 10/1185 (0.8%) had preoperative intravenous chemotherapy with radiotherapy and surgery, 3/1185 (0.3%) had preoperative radiotherapy with surgery, 27/1185 (2%) had no surgery and chemoradiotherapy, 19/1185 (2%) had no surgery and radiotherapy only, and 10/1185 (0.8%) patients had palliative treatment. Primary radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy was performed with curative intent in 28/46 (61%) patients [9,10,20], with palliative intent in 3/46 (7%) patients [9], while 3/46 (7%) patients refused surgery [20] and in 12/46 (26%) patients the reason was unspecified [9,25,26]. In any event, patients who had primary radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy had significantly lower survival rates compared to patients with primary surgical treatment [9,10,20].…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations