1992
DOI: 10.1016/0368-2048(92)80038-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Si2p electron attenuation lengths in SiO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above and the sputtering study are independent in their approach and their agreement indicates that the experimental values are valid. The average of these two values, 0.88 š 0.03, is close to that of Fulghum 17,18 and lies at the upper end of the range given by others in Table 2. It is very different from the theoretical value.…”
Section: Bulk Silicon Dioxidementioning
confidence: 55%
“…The above and the sputtering study are independent in their approach and their agreement indicates that the experimental values are valid. The average of these two values, 0.88 š 0.03, is close to that of Fulghum 17,18 and lies at the upper end of the range given by others in Table 2. It is very different from the theoretical value.…”
Section: Bulk Silicon Dioxidementioning
confidence: 55%
“…The validity of this approach was established; firstly by comparing the thickness of two SiO 2 /Si samples obtained by this method against the thickness obtained by Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS), and ellipsometry [6], and secondly by comparing the thickness obtained by XPS against the thickness obtained by Nuclear Reaction Analysis [2]. The molar volume of Si is 12.056 cm 3 and the molar volume of SiO x N y is approximated as 23.5 cm 3 , from the molar volume of SiO 2 , which has a wide range from 20 to 27 cm 3 depending on the crystal structure [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…n is the density of Si atoms in the corresponding layer, s is the photoionization cross section, l SiO x N y and l Si are the attenuation lengths of the photoelectrons in the overlayer and underlayer respectively, d is the thickness of the overlayer, and Q is the take-off angle [1][2][3]6,9]. The validity of this approach was established; firstly by comparing the thickness of two SiO 2 /Si samples obtained by this method against the thickness obtained by Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS), and ellipsometry [6], and secondly by comparing the thickness obtained by XPS against the thickness obtained by Nuclear Reaction Analysis [2].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The IMFP is a function of the energy of the electron and of the structure of the investigated solid. Several empirical or semiempirical formulas have been proposed to compute the IMFP in solids (Seah and Dench, 1979;Powell, 1984;Penn, 1987;Tanuma et al, 1993;Baschenko and Nesmeev, 1991;Fulghum et al, 1992). According to the formulas of Seah and Dench (1979), the mean free path length for inelastic scattering is 538 a,,, =-+o.41-E t i n where am is the number of monolayers that can be converted in IMFP according to IMFP =a,,, x d Eq.…”
Section: Analytical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%