Abstract:Bitkisel tasarımda bitki türlerinin doku ve renk etkisinde katkısı en fazla olan organları yapraklarıdır. Yapraklar, tasarım ilkeleri doğrultusunda mekanda birer tasarım öğesi olarak kullanıldığı gibi görsel algıya göre değerlendirilmeleri bitkisel tasarımlarda daha etkili ve başarılı sonuçlar yaratacaktır. Bu çalışmada, Antalya kent merkezinde bulunan Akdeniz Üniversitesi kampüsündeki herdem yeşil geniş yapraklı ağaçların yapraklarının görsel algılanmasında şekil ve renk ilişkisinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır… Show more
“…Perception may differ for each person due to different experiences, cultures, and personality traits of individuals. Therefore, perception is not an instantaneous reaction but a process with a large dimension (Boztepe Taşkıran, 2010;Kösa, 2019;Wang et al, 2010). There are five classes in perception to be visual, auditory, gustatory, olfactory, and tactile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, visual perception is one of the most effective perceptions among other types of perception. The main elements of visual perception are shape, color, line, light, space, and structure (Kösa, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual perception, which is used to determine the visual and aesthetic value of the landscape, has been used by many researchers in the evaluation of different spatial features. These studies are listed as follows: user perception of planting design and plant compositions studies (Acar & Ayhan Güneroğlu, 2009;Acar & Derya, 2010;Demirbaş et al, 2003;Erduran & Kabaş, 2010;Kösa, 2019;Müderrisoğlu & Eroğlu, 2006;Sakıcı et al, 2012;Tarakçı Eren et al, 2018); visual evaluation of different vegetation types (Sarı & Karaşah, 2015); visual perception of pedestrian roads (Aytaş & Uzun, 2015;A. Kaplan & Coşkun Hepcan, 2004;Rezazadeh, 2011;Tsuchiya, 2013); the effect of the visual attractiveness of urban parks on user perception (Altınçekiç & Erdönmez, 2001;Çakcı & Çelem, 2009;Karmanov & Hamel, 2009;Kurdoğlu & Üstün Topal, 2017;Mahdavinejad & Abedi, 2012;Surat, 2017;Yazıcı & Kiper, 2019); studies on the past and current situations of public spaces such as city squares (Acarlı & Kiper, 2018;Çınar & Çetindağ, 2009); evaluation of visual landscape quality of recreational areas (Özhancı & Yılmaz, 2011); quantifying user preferences with visual perception on different subjects such as landscape quality and visual assessment (Engin Dere, 2017;Hacıalioğlu et al, 2017).…”
Visual perception studies in the public space are important in improving and developing any space’s design features. This study aims to evaluate landscape architects’ and architects’ visual perception of Balakgazi park design in the city of Elazig. Study methodology consists of four stages: (1) Determining the adjective pairs related to the feelings of pleasure, excitement, and dominance that are effective in evaluating the design; (2) Preparation of visual perception questionnaires; (3) Determination of visual perceptions with semantic differentiation technique. At this stage, the determined 18 adjective pairs were rated by the participants according to the 7-point Likert scale (1=Negative, 7=Positive). (4) Statistical analysis of the obtained data. At this stage, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to group the predominant adjective pairs in participant perceptions. MANOVA was used to determine whether the factors changed according to the socio-demographic characteristics of participants (gender, age, education level, etc.). In this study, the responses of 207 participants, 107 of them landscape architects and 98 architects, were evaluated. The data obtained from both groups were evaluated separately. The main results show that “Uninteresting-Interesting” got the lowest score (2.74), and the highest score was “Complex-Simple” (4.67) in the adjective pairs in Balakgazi park by the landscape architects. On the other hand, in architects, “Insufficient Green-Green” (3.19) has the lowest value, while the highest score is “Complex-Simple” (4.48). Landscape architects generally negatively evaluated the adjective pairs. As a result of the EFA, the adjective pairs were grouped under two-factor groups: “Excitement” and “Pleasure and Dominance” according to landscape architects. On the other hand, architects determined two-factor groups: “Excitement and Dominance” and “Excitement”. MANOVA results show that while there was no statistical difference in the determination of the factor groups according to gender and whether participants had seen the Balakgazi park (p>0.05), there were differences in their responses according to their levels of design education (p
“…Perception may differ for each person due to different experiences, cultures, and personality traits of individuals. Therefore, perception is not an instantaneous reaction but a process with a large dimension (Boztepe Taşkıran, 2010;Kösa, 2019;Wang et al, 2010). There are five classes in perception to be visual, auditory, gustatory, olfactory, and tactile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, visual perception is one of the most effective perceptions among other types of perception. The main elements of visual perception are shape, color, line, light, space, and structure (Kösa, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual perception, which is used to determine the visual and aesthetic value of the landscape, has been used by many researchers in the evaluation of different spatial features. These studies are listed as follows: user perception of planting design and plant compositions studies (Acar & Ayhan Güneroğlu, 2009;Acar & Derya, 2010;Demirbaş et al, 2003;Erduran & Kabaş, 2010;Kösa, 2019;Müderrisoğlu & Eroğlu, 2006;Sakıcı et al, 2012;Tarakçı Eren et al, 2018); visual evaluation of different vegetation types (Sarı & Karaşah, 2015); visual perception of pedestrian roads (Aytaş & Uzun, 2015;A. Kaplan & Coşkun Hepcan, 2004;Rezazadeh, 2011;Tsuchiya, 2013); the effect of the visual attractiveness of urban parks on user perception (Altınçekiç & Erdönmez, 2001;Çakcı & Çelem, 2009;Karmanov & Hamel, 2009;Kurdoğlu & Üstün Topal, 2017;Mahdavinejad & Abedi, 2012;Surat, 2017;Yazıcı & Kiper, 2019); studies on the past and current situations of public spaces such as city squares (Acarlı & Kiper, 2018;Çınar & Çetindağ, 2009); evaluation of visual landscape quality of recreational areas (Özhancı & Yılmaz, 2011); quantifying user preferences with visual perception on different subjects such as landscape quality and visual assessment (Engin Dere, 2017;Hacıalioğlu et al, 2017).…”
Visual perception studies in the public space are important in improving and developing any space’s design features. This study aims to evaluate landscape architects’ and architects’ visual perception of Balakgazi park design in the city of Elazig. Study methodology consists of four stages: (1) Determining the adjective pairs related to the feelings of pleasure, excitement, and dominance that are effective in evaluating the design; (2) Preparation of visual perception questionnaires; (3) Determination of visual perceptions with semantic differentiation technique. At this stage, the determined 18 adjective pairs were rated by the participants according to the 7-point Likert scale (1=Negative, 7=Positive). (4) Statistical analysis of the obtained data. At this stage, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to group the predominant adjective pairs in participant perceptions. MANOVA was used to determine whether the factors changed according to the socio-demographic characteristics of participants (gender, age, education level, etc.). In this study, the responses of 207 participants, 107 of them landscape architects and 98 architects, were evaluated. The data obtained from both groups were evaluated separately. The main results show that “Uninteresting-Interesting” got the lowest score (2.74), and the highest score was “Complex-Simple” (4.67) in the adjective pairs in Balakgazi park by the landscape architects. On the other hand, in architects, “Insufficient Green-Green” (3.19) has the lowest value, while the highest score is “Complex-Simple” (4.48). Landscape architects generally negatively evaluated the adjective pairs. As a result of the EFA, the adjective pairs were grouped under two-factor groups: “Excitement” and “Pleasure and Dominance” according to landscape architects. On the other hand, architects determined two-factor groups: “Excitement and Dominance” and “Excitement”. MANOVA results show that while there was no statistical difference in the determination of the factor groups according to gender and whether participants had seen the Balakgazi park (p>0.05), there were differences in their responses according to their levels of design education (p
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.