2014
DOI: 10.5455/jrmds.2014234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of sex from the width and the area of human sternum and manubrium in Gujarat population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However it can't be said if any particular sternum given is definitely male or female by these rules. 2,9 The sternal index of female was significantly greater than the male in our study. However few authors found no significant difference between the SI of two sexes as both of the values were close and above fifty.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However it can't be said if any particular sternum given is definitely male or female by these rules. 2,9 The sternal index of female was significantly greater than the male in our study. However few authors found no significant difference between the SI of two sexes as both of the values were close and above fifty.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…1,7,19 Though, a number of bones such as pelvis, skull, femur etc., have contributed significantly in estimating sex, 2,7,10,20 in situations when these bones are missing, less sexually dimorphic bones as sternum should be taken. 2,7,9,14,15,[21][22][23][24] The sternum having a robust structure can survive a great degree of compression and can be procured from cadavers without damage. 1,2,5,10,13,18 Many researchers have studied sternum in order to prove its usage as an indicator of sex in different populations.…”
Section: Original Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The identification points (IP) were determined by the lowest value of a parameter in females and highest value for the same in males. 7,[23][24][25][26] All the values less than the minimum value for the females were treated as male bone for width, posterior segment, total angle, posterior angle and Index II and the bones having values more than maximum value of males were treated as female bones as females have greater measurement than male for these parameters. Similarly for Index I and depth, maximum value of female was IP for male and minimum value of male was IP for female as males have greater measurement than female in these parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demarking point (DP) was calculated by using ± 3 SD in mean. 7,[23][24][25][26] Mean ± 3 SD ensured that > 99% of the value fall within the range calculated. The minimum value in…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%