“…Contrarily, other researchers found that the distal portion of the humerus is a more successful indicator than the proximal part [4,9,11] (Table 6). This can be explained by population and ethnic differences which have been noted in anthropological studies and it is well realized that they need to be studied separately [29,30]. By using multivariate analysis, the rate of correct classification in sex assessment from the measurements of the humerus in this study ranged from 88.4% to 94.3%, with an accuracy of 94.3% for Function 1 (vertical head diameter + epicondylar breadth).…”