2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejfs.2011.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of sex from hand dimensions and index/ring finger length ratio in Upper Egyptians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
33
3
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
33
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrarily, other researchers found that the distal portion of the humerus is a more successful indicator than the proximal part [4,9,11] (Table 6). This can be explained by population and ethnic differences which have been noted in anthropological studies and it is well realized that they need to be studied separately [29,30]. By using multivariate analysis, the rate of correct classification in sex assessment from the measurements of the humerus in this study ranged from 88.4% to 94.3%, with an accuracy of 94.3% for Function 1 (vertical head diameter + epicondylar breadth).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Contrarily, other researchers found that the distal portion of the humerus is a more successful indicator than the proximal part [4,9,11] (Table 6). This can be explained by population and ethnic differences which have been noted in anthropological studies and it is well realized that they need to be studied separately [29,30]. By using multivariate analysis, the rate of correct classification in sex assessment from the measurements of the humerus in this study ranged from 88.4% to 94.3%, with an accuracy of 94.3% for Function 1 (vertical head diameter + epicondylar breadth).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Measurements illustrated on metacarpal two (radiograph of an adult female right hand). Previous studies examining the fleshed hand also affirm that width and breadth measurements are more sexually dimorphic than length measurements [31,32]. It has been suggested that greater expression of sexual dimorphism in hand width measurements (both skeletal and fleshed) is related to functional loading in response to mechanical stimulus [33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Earlier studies on sex determination with hand dimension also suggest the similar results that males have statistically larger dimension of hands than females. 16,25 Male-female differences was found statistically significant at p<0.001 for both hand length and hand breadth but non-significant for difference between right and left hand in both sexes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Aboul-Hagag, et al in their study of determination of sex from hand indices in upper egyptians derived cut-off point of 40.55 to discriminate between sex. 25 Foot index in females was foundto be more than 36 and in males less than 36. A study on determination of sex from foot index revealed that it will be female if foot index is found to be equal or more than 36 and male if it is les than 36.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation