1963
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)88639-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of semimicro amounts of tellurium by electrodeposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1964
1964

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lanese and .Jaselskis (140) determined Te by electrodeposition a t a copper cathode from a supporting electrolyte consisting of zLbf HLSOI, 0.4M (KH&S04, 0.1M sodium tartrate, and 0.06X N a N 0 3 a t a potential of -0.6 volts us. a saturated mercurous sulfate electrode and showed that the average error was less than 1%. A statistical study of the controlled potential deposition of Cu from various aqueous solutions has been made (300), and the authors conclude that the method is most precise and accurate from a HXO3 or tartaric acid supporting electrolyte.…”
Section: Electrogravimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lanese and .Jaselskis (140) determined Te by electrodeposition a t a copper cathode from a supporting electrolyte consisting of zLbf HLSOI, 0.4M (KH&S04, 0.1M sodium tartrate, and 0.06X N a N 0 3 a t a potential of -0.6 volts us. a saturated mercurous sulfate electrode and showed that the average error was less than 1%. A statistical study of the controlled potential deposition of Cu from various aqueous solutions has been made (300), and the authors conclude that the method is most precise and accurate from a HXO3 or tartaric acid supporting electrolyte.…”
Section: Electrogravimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Láñese and Jaselskis (140) determined Te by electrodeposition at a copper cathode from a supporting electrolyte consisting of 2M H2S04, 0AM (ÑH4)2S04, 0.14/ sodium tartrate, and 0.064/ NaN03 at a potential of -0.6 volts vs. a saturated mercurous sulfate electrode and showed that the average error was less than 1%.…”
Section: Controlledmentioning
confidence: 99%