2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.02.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of SCFAs in water using GC-FID. Selection of the separation system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These peaks are difficult to integrate reliably and often lead to reduced analyte response. 22,23 The peak shapes of polar compounds such as amines are particularly sensitive to active sites in gas chromatographs (such as exposed silica and deposits in inlet liners or columns) and dipole−dipole or ionic interactions with the column phase. 21,22 The widths and asymmetry factors of the MEA peak on five different column phases are reported in Table 2.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These peaks are difficult to integrate reliably and often lead to reduced analyte response. 22,23 The peak shapes of polar compounds such as amines are particularly sensitive to active sites in gas chromatographs (such as exposed silica and deposits in inlet liners or columns) and dipole−dipole or ionic interactions with the column phase. 21,22 The widths and asymmetry factors of the MEA peak on five different column phases are reported in Table 2.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Established GC methods for measuring the concentrations of acidic polar organic compounds in aqueous matrixes are widely available in the peer-reviewed literature, but very little information is available for the analysis of basic compounds in aqueous matrixes. In this study, the most appropriate column phases were selected by comparing the MEA peak shapes on five different column phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this reason, the measurement of SCFA in biogas production has been recognized as a quantitative indicator for monitoring biogas production efficiency (Sheveleva andRamenskaya 2010, Madsen, Holm-Nielsen et al 2011). Thus, the monitoring of SCFAs produced by microbial samples is necessary for various reasons and it can be measured from a culture medium which is required for microbial growth (Banel, Jakimska et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%