2004
DOI: 10.1190/1.1778233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of relative angles and anisotropic resistivity using multicomponent induction logging data

Abstract: We have developed a new algorithm that retrieves information about relative dip angle, relative azimuth angle, vertical resistivity, and horizontal resistivity from multicomponent EM induction logging data. To investigate how relative dip and azimuth angles affect multicomponent induction logging data, we performed a sensitivity analysis using an anisotropic whole space model. Based upon the sensitivity analysis, we designed a two‐step procedure to recover relative dip, relative azimuth, horizontal resistivity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The horizontal and vertical resistivities can not be decoupled if only conventional induction logging data are used [2] , which will lead to incorrect evaluation of oil-gas saturation. The multi-component induction logging technology [2∼6] can simultaneously measure formation's horizontal and vertical resistivities, and can realize the decoupling of horizontal resistivity, vertical resistivity and borehole's deviation angles [5] , so the measured information can be much increased and the evaluation with high precision can be accomplished for complex formations, especially for anisotropic formations in deviated or horizontal boreholes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The horizontal and vertical resistivities can not be decoupled if only conventional induction logging data are used [2] , which will lead to incorrect evaluation of oil-gas saturation. The multi-component induction logging technology [2∼6] can simultaneously measure formation's horizontal and vertical resistivities, and can realize the decoupling of horizontal resistivity, vertical resistivity and borehole's deviation angles [5] , so the measured information can be much increased and the evaluation with high precision can be accomplished for complex formations, especially for anisotropic formations in deviated or horizontal boreholes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without specification, the same distance between transmitter and main receiver and bucking coil are the same as in the first example. Then in given by Equation (8). The abnormally large dielectric constant is frequency dependent.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some cross components give contributions to detect formation boundary. The inversion approach has been developed to detect dipping angle based on both coplanar and cross components [8][9][10][11]. However, the dielectric effect on coplanar and cross components is still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to get an acceptable starting point for the Zero-D inversion, we use the analytic expressions to compute the dipping angle α and the rotation angle γ horizontal conductivity σ h and vertical conductivity σ v directly [6,14]:…”
Section: Starting Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, robust layer position must be known as priori information. Later, Zhang et al presented three analytical methods for the determination of the relative dipping angle and azimuthal angle [6]. Wang et al introduced an 1-D inversion algorithm by applying Gauss-Newton to retrieve the transverse isotropic formation parameters [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%