1980
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800415)45:8<2213::aid-cncr2820450834>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of prognostic factors and their influence on therapeutic results in patients with Ewing's sarcoma

Abstract: We have analyzed the results of treatment of 117 patients with Ewing's sarcoma admitted to the National Cancer Institute since 1964. All patients received local irradiation to the primary site and a series of progressively more intensive systemic chemotherapy regimens using drugs known to be active as single agents in this disease. Four protocols were employed with varying numbers of patients in each treatment group. Initially, there appeared to be a difference among treatment groups with regard to disease-fre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
7

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Egger's test (19,20,(22)(23)(24)(25). The funnel plot for this meta-analysis revealed evidence of symmetry, and the P-value from the Egger's test was 0.707 in the OS studies (Fig.…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Egger's test (19,20,(22)(23)(24)(25). The funnel plot for this meta-analysis revealed evidence of symmetry, and the P-value from the Egger's test was 0.707 in the OS studies (Fig.…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 78%
“…1 shows a flow diagram of the selection process for defining the relative studies. Following the process of selection, nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). The major characteristics of the nine eligible publications are shown in Table I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31] Use of markers in the specific diagnosis of disease have been considered, 32 but the most researched use of tumour markers has been in the development of prognostic risk groups in order to target therapy. [33][34][35][36][37][38] Use of tumour markers in the monitoring of patients following primary therapy has also been considered. 39,40 Rationale for a systematic review of tumour markers in paediatric oncology A persistent difficulty in conducting primary research in paediatric oncology, not just in relation to the use of tumour markers, is the relatively small number of children who develop disease, and the therefore low statistical power which individual primary studies have of detecting either treatment benefits or survival benefits arising out of prognostic staging (using tumour markers).…”
Section: Use Of Tumour Markers In Paediatric Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31] Use of markers in the specific diagnosis of disease have been considered, 32 but the most researched use of tumour markers has been in the development of prognostic risk groups in order to target therapy. [33][34][35][36][37][38] Use of tumour markers in the monitoring of patients following primary therapy has also been considered. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review of prognostic factors, the adverse influence of older age, pelvic site and presence of metastatic disease was confirmed (Glaubiger et al, 1980;Craft, 1985). In addition, male gender and increasing tumour volume were identified as possible indicators of poor outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%