2005
DOI: 10.1080/10286600500383923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of preconsolidation pressure with artificial neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low value of the RMSE satisfies the statistical evaluation of prediction for the validation [29,30]. From Fig.…”
Section: Application Of Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Low value of the RMSE satisfies the statistical evaluation of prediction for the validation [29,30]. From Fig.…”
Section: Application Of Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Low values of RMSE, SDR and MAE satisfy the statistical evaluation of prediction for the validation [29,30]. Before the network was trained, the input and the output data had been normalized; the scale and shift factors which were used in every input and output were given in Table 2.…”
Section: Application Of Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geotechnical properties of soils are controlled by factors such as mineralogy; fabric; and pore water, and the interactions of these factors are difficult to establish solely by traditional statistical methods due to their interdependence (Yang and Rosenbaum, 2002). Based on the application of ANNs, methodologies have been developed for estimating several soil properties including the preconsolidation pressure (Celik and Tan, 2005), shear strength and stress history swell pressure (Erzin 2007 andNajjar et al, 1996a), compaction and permeability (Agrawal et al, 1994;Goh, 1995b), soil classification (Cal, 1995) and soil density (Goh, 1995b).…”
Section: In Geo-technical Engineering:-mentioning
confidence: 99%