2011
DOI: 10.1186/1477-3155-9-24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of pore size distribution at the cell-hydrogel interface

Abstract: BackgroundAnalyses of the pore size distribution in 3D matrices such as the cell-hydrogel interface are very useful when studying changes and modifications produced as a result of cellular growth and proliferation within the matrix, as pore size distribution plays an important role in the signaling and microenvironment stimuli imparted to the cells. However, the majority of the methods for the assessment of the porosity in biomaterials are not suitable to give quantitative information about the textural proper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells form larger spheres when encapsulated in alginate gels with larger pore sizes. 72 The mesh size of the PEGDA gels was calculated from the modulus and equilibrium swelling ratio of the gels using the Peppas and Barr-Howell equation, as described. 73 As the macromer concentration was increased from 7.5% to 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%, the mesh size decreased significantly from 93 -4 nm to 67 -3, 53 -3, 34 -2, and 25 -2 nm, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells form larger spheres when encapsulated in alginate gels with larger pore sizes. 72 The mesh size of the PEGDA gels was calculated from the modulus and equilibrium swelling ratio of the gels using the Peppas and Barr-Howell equation, as described. 73 As the macromer concentration was increased from 7.5% to 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%, the mesh size decreased significantly from 93 -4 nm to 67 -3, 53 -3, 34 -2, and 25 -2 nm, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lowering the alginate concentration increases the pore size ( 37 ). Leal-Egaña and colleagues ( 38 ) have determined the pore size distribution of different concentrations of alginate gels using both N 2 adsorption and image analysis. At both 0.8% and 1.4% alginate (w/v), the pore-size distribution ranged from <10 nm up to 70 nm, with the average pore size being greater at 0.8% alginate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, the second terms of Eqs. (25) and (26) additionally contribute to elastic Hookean behavior. When meso S → 1, we obtain C 0 D 1 t (ε m (r, t, )) → ∂ε m (r, t, )/∂t and r, t, )) → ∂θ m (r, t, )/∂t.…”
Section: Matrix Structural Changes At Mesoscopic Level-rheological Apmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first terms of the right hand side of Eqs. (25) and (26) represent the reversible (elastic) part and the second terms include the anomalous nature of the matrix stress generation. If the parameter m = 0, we obtain C 0 D 0 t (ε m (r, t, )) =ε m (r, t, ) and C 0 D 0 t (θ m (r, t, )) =θ m (r, t, ).…”
Section: Matrix Structural Changes At Mesoscopic Level-rheological Apmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation