1981
DOI: 10.5006/1.3577553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Pit Growth Rates on Aluminum Using a Metal Foil Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
74
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are comparable to trends from power law fits for immersed and atmospheric conditions of Al 1100 reported elsewhere. [33][34][35] Observations of coupon-level and individual droplet experiments suggest the average corrosion rate trends may be collectively dependent on initiation, growth, and stifling of pits associated with drying of individual salt deposits. The fraction of salt deposit sites over time where corrosion is observed to occur; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values are comparable to trends from power law fits for immersed and atmospheric conditions of Al 1100 reported elsewhere. [33][34][35] Observations of coupon-level and individual droplet experiments suggest the average corrosion rate trends may be collectively dependent on initiation, growth, and stifling of pits associated with drying of individual salt deposits. The fraction of salt deposit sites over time where corrosion is observed to occur; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 4b, the estimated mass loss (Δm) is calculated assuming hemispherical pit volumes 33 with pit depths from Eq. 1, the number of corroding sites, n j,t , at t, the time of exposure from 0 to l, the total exposure time, and j, the growth time of the individual corrosion sites, from 0 to k, the total growth time of each site (from Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pitting of aluminum in chloride solutions, the topic of this work, measurements of the potential dependence of the pit current density have been carried out by a number of investigators, who have focused on the growth of pits at potentials positive to the pitting and repassivation potentials. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Hunkeler and Böhni found that the pit current increases with potential and is controlled by the ohmic resistance of the pit solution. 2,3 Frankel and co-workers investigated the growth of two-dimensional pits in thin aluminum films and noted a potential region above the pitting potential in which the pit current increased with potential, and at higher potentials a current plateau which was ascribed to mass-transport limited dissolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Hunkeler and Böhni found that the pit current increases with potential and is controlled by the ohmic resistance of the pit solution. 2,3 Frankel and co-workers investigated the growth of two-dimensional pits in thin aluminum films and noted a potential region above the pitting potential in which the pit current increased with potential, and at higher potentials a current plateau which was ascribed to mass-transport limited dissolution. 1,4 Like Hunkeler and Böhni, they concluded that the first region was controlled by ohmic resistance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial version of the foil penetration method was, in fact, based on this leaching which soaked the filter paper which was replaced in this work by a pH-indicator paper. The same approach was discussed in pioneering works of Boehni for pitting detection 15 but it was concluded that the pH information was insufficient and did not allow further conclusions concerning the chloride concentration within the pit. Experimental results.-IG propagation kinetics on AA2024 under potentiostatic conditions.-Analysis of the scattering of data.-A first set of foil penetration experiments were performed on 210-μm thick foils at different potentials above the breakdown potential (-580 mV).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%