2000
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2594(200011)44:5<799::aid-mrm18>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of pH using water protons and chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
390
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 370 publications
(400 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
390
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such CEST contrast agents may prove to have some advantages over conventional T 1 -shortening agents because proton exchange is quite sensitive to temperature, pH and other physiologically related parameters, and the CEST contrast effect can be switched on and off using frequency-selective RF presaturation pulses. One disadvantage of the CEST contrast mechanism compared with typical T 1 shortening agents is that the amount of the CEST agent required to produce significant water contrast is unrealistically high (2), although later reports demonstrated that the CEST effect can be amplified using cationic diamagnetic macromolecular systems (polyamino acids and dendrimers) possessing a large number of amide-NH groups (3) or by entrapment of an aqueous shift reagent inside liposomes (4). We and others have demonstrated that the CEST effect also works in certain paramagnetic complexes where exchange between a Ln 3þ -bound water molecule and bulk water is unusually slow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such CEST contrast agents may prove to have some advantages over conventional T 1 -shortening agents because proton exchange is quite sensitive to temperature, pH and other physiologically related parameters, and the CEST contrast effect can be switched on and off using frequency-selective RF presaturation pulses. One disadvantage of the CEST contrast mechanism compared with typical T 1 shortening agents is that the amount of the CEST agent required to produce significant water contrast is unrealistically high (2), although later reports demonstrated that the CEST effect can be amplified using cationic diamagnetic macromolecular systems (polyamino acids and dendrimers) possessing a large number of amide-NH groups (3) or by entrapment of an aqueous shift reagent inside liposomes (4). We and others have demonstrated that the CEST effect also works in certain paramagnetic complexes where exchange between a Ln 3þ -bound water molecule and bulk water is unusually slow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate this possibility, we used chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) (21)(22)(23) techniques in which selective radio frequency (RF) irradiation of solute protons is detected through progressive saturation of the water signal as a function of time. Because hydroxyl protons exchange rather quickly with solvent protons [exchange rate, k Ͼ 10 3 per s, (24)], saturated hydroxyl spins on glycogen transfer rapidly to the water protons and thereby reduce the intensity of the water signal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has demonstrated that the CEST effect of amide and amine groups has a complex relationship with the chemical exchange rate and acidity. 26,27) We previously showed that the CEST asymmetry of the molecules was decreased with increasing pH at 9.4T MRI. 9) The CEST asymmetry values for GABA, Glu, and Gly which contain amine groups were lowest with the highest pH which was consistent with the previous amine group studies, 9,28) which showed the decreased CEST asymmetry values with increasing pH for the amine protons.…”
Section: Cest With Aciditymentioning
confidence: 99%