2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2018.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of PDFs and the strong coupling based on four different schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Extra Minimisation Parameters: In fitting with fixed strong coupling, we set the strong coupling to α s (M 2 Z ) = 0.1176 and in fitting with free strong coupling, we varied α s (M 2 Z ) in steps of 0.001. In addition, we fixed the strangeness suppression factor to f s = 0.31, which has the best consistency with other physical parameters of this NLO QCD analysis [46][47][48][49]. 2.0.0 FrozenFrog and start this NLO QCD analysis evolution at starting scale of Q 2 0 = 1.9 GeV 2 [50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Fitting and Qcd Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Extra Minimisation Parameters: In fitting with fixed strong coupling, we set the strong coupling to α s (M 2 Z ) = 0.1176 and in fitting with free strong coupling, we varied α s (M 2 Z ) in steps of 0.001. In addition, we fixed the strangeness suppression factor to f s = 0.31, which has the best consistency with other physical parameters of this NLO QCD analysis [46][47][48][49]. 2.0.0 FrozenFrog and start this NLO QCD analysis evolution at starting scale of Q 2 0 = 1.9 GeV 2 [50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Fitting and Qcd Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• To fitting with experimental data, we us the xFitter package as a powerful QCD open source framework [81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89].…”
Section: Qcd Analysis Set-up and Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%