2013
DOI: 10.1117/1.oe.52.4.043605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of particle-size distributions from light-scattering measurement using Lucy-Richardson algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method described there is equivalent to the Lucy-Richardson method (Richardson, 1972;Lucy, 1974). The method has been applied for calculating a size distribution from scattering data by several authors (Yang et al, 2013;Benvenuto et al, 2016;Benvenuto, 2017;Bakry et al, 2019). Although the convergence of the iterative EM algorithm is ensured since the algorithm is guaranteed to increase the likelihood with each iteration, a stable solution cannot be obtained because of its ill-posed nature and because an additional stabilization mechanism is required.…”
Section: Regularization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method described there is equivalent to the Lucy-Richardson method (Richardson, 1972;Lucy, 1974). The method has been applied for calculating a size distribution from scattering data by several authors (Yang et al, 2013;Benvenuto et al, 2016;Benvenuto, 2017;Bakry et al, 2019). Although the convergence of the iterative EM algorithm is ensured since the algorithm is guaranteed to increase the likelihood with each iteration, a stable solution cannot be obtained because of its ill-posed nature and because an additional stabilization mechanism is required.…”
Section: Regularization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy of using analytical expressions for the size distribution may limit the model too much to give a reasonable agreement with the data. To overcome this issue, regularization techniques (Lucy, 1974(Lucy, , 1994Glatter, 1977;Svergun, 1992;Yang et al, 2013) and Monte Carlo methods have been used (Krautha ¨user et al, 1996;Breßler et al, 2015), mainly due to the lack of flexibility of available analytical probability distribution functions (PDFs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%