2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of optimum cut-off grade of an open-pit metalliferous deposit under various limiting conditions using a linearly advancing algorithm derived from dynamic programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic programming (DP) has been widely used in mining projects to make optimal decisions considering geological and commodity price uncertainty (Rimélé et al, 2020;M. F. Del Castillo Ali, et al (2024) & Dimitrakopoulos, 2019Biswas et al, 2020;Inthavongsa et al, 2016). DP transforms complex decision-making problems into interconnected subproblems, allowing efficient optimization in the face of uncertainties.…”
Section: Decision Making With Dynamic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic programming (DP) has been widely used in mining projects to make optimal decisions considering geological and commodity price uncertainty (Rimélé et al, 2020;M. F. Del Castillo Ali, et al (2024) & Dimitrakopoulos, 2019Biswas et al, 2020;Inthavongsa et al, 2016). DP transforms complex decision-making problems into interconnected subproblems, allowing efficient optimization in the face of uncertainties.…”
Section: Decision Making With Dynamic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method fails to give a satisfactory answer when the projects need different levels of investment and with a different economic life of the projects. However, a few authors have also advocated that the theory of 𝐶𝑂𝐺 optimization supports the ultimate objective of a mining operation through maximization of 𝑁𝑃𝑉 [43][44][45]. Ahmadi and Bazzazi [46] proposed that choosing the optimal 𝐶𝑂𝐺 maximizes the 𝑁𝑃𝑉 and the total profit of the project.…”
Section: Dehghani and Bogdanovicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…𝐶𝐹 (𝛼,𝛽) = { 𝑆𝑃 (𝛼,𝛽) × 𝑄 𝑐 (𝛼,𝛽) × ḡ (𝛼,𝛽) × 𝑌 𝑐 (𝛼,𝛽) × 𝑌 𝑟 (𝛼,𝛽) -∑𝛷 (𝑀 (𝛼,𝛽) , 𝐶 (𝛼,𝛽) , 𝑅 (𝛼,𝛽) ) − ∑𝜉 (𝑀 (𝛼,𝛽), 𝐶 (𝛼,𝛽), 𝑅 (𝛼,𝛽) -𝐴𝐶 (𝛼,𝛽) -𝐷 (𝛼,𝛽) } (1-𝑇𝑅 (𝛼,𝛽)) ) + 𝐷 (𝛼,𝛽) (43) The objective function is to maximize the 𝑁𝑃𝑉 for the whole deposit over the whole Mine life (𝑛). It is the cumulative summation of all the cash flows (𝐶𝐹 0 , 𝐶𝐹 1 , 𝐶𝐹 2 … 𝐶𝐹 𝑛 ), where 𝐶𝐹 0 is the capital invested having a fixed discount rate of '𝜕′ up to 𝑛 𝑡ℎ year given by equation (44) .…”
Section: Stage -Iiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahmadi optimized the 𝐶𝑂𝐺 based on Lane's theory to maximize the 𝑁𝑃𝑉 using MATLAB. The optimum 𝐶𝑂𝐺 is the grade that maximizes the chosen objective function, usually the 𝑁𝑃𝑉 (Asad & Topal, 2011;Biswas et al, 2020). Various researchers (Ahmadi & Shahabi, 2018;Bascetin & Nieto, 2007;Qingfei Wang et al, 2010) have given several algorithms to determine optimum 𝐶𝑂𝐺.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of 𝑄 𝑐 (𝛼,𝛽) and 𝑄 𝑟 (𝛼,𝛽) are calculated using equations ( 36) and ( 37). The selection of the optimal 𝐶𝑂𝐺 is followed by a multi-staged sequential decision problem (Li & Yang, 2012;Biswas et al, 2020) with the output from each state feeding as an input for the following stages. Each stage has multiple different states correlated with it, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒆 -𝑰𝑰mentioning
confidence: 99%