1996
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4347(95)00359-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of opiates in urine by capillary electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydrodynamic injection for a long period of time usually results in peak broadening. It has been demonstrated in a previous report (Taylor et al, 1996) that the detection sensitivity of CZE of opiates in extracted urine was significantly increased using electrokinetic instead of hydrodymamic sample injection. Figure 2 depicts electropherograms of CZE of a blank urine spiked with free and conjugated morphine (5 and 10 mg/mL, respectively) injected electrokinetically (10 kV for 30 s).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hydrodynamic injection for a long period of time usually results in peak broadening. It has been demonstrated in a previous report (Taylor et al, 1996) that the detection sensitivity of CZE of opiates in extracted urine was significantly increased using electrokinetic instead of hydrodymamic sample injection. Figure 2 depicts electropherograms of CZE of a blank urine spiked with free and conjugated morphine (5 and 10 mg/mL, respectively) injected electrokinetically (10 kV for 30 s).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, capillary electrophoresis (CE) with on-line multiwavelength UV detection has been an attractive approach for the determination of pharmaceuticals in body fluids (for a review see Thormann et al, 1994). Both capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MECC) have been employed for the determination of opiates in urine Thormann, 1992, 1993;Hyotylainen et al, 1996;Taylor et al, 1996;Zhang and Thormann, 1997). In most procedures, time consuming liquid or solid phase extraction of urine samples were required prior to CE analysis for unambiguous peak identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When opiates were injected from MeOH-HAc (100:0.2), peak areas were considerably reduced from those obtained in the mixture of MeOH-H 2 O-HAc. This phenomenon can be ascribed to that precipitation occurred, due to the higher concentration of buffer required to achieve resolution [5]. It was found that the highest S/N was yielded with the solution of MeOH-H 2 O-HAc (50:50:0.2 v/v/v), probably because this solution provides the best conditions for solute ionization together with low conductivity of the sample matrix.…”
Section: Optimization Of Normal Polarity Fesimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEKC has been used for the simultaneous separation and determination of a wide variety of neutral and charged illicit drugs [3]. As an alternative to MEKC, studies using CZE were also presented for the investigation of controlled substances [4,5]. Recently, the use of b-CD to modulate the separation of opiates in a CZE method has also been reported [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of fully automated, commercially available capillary electrophoresis (CE) systems has presented the forensic analyst with a new and viable analytical alternative to HPLC and TLC [1]. As with most analytical techniques, one of the limiting factors to high sensitivity and selectivity in CE is the detection method employed [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%