2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of octreotide and assessment of matrix effects in human plasma using ultra high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A 15-fold dilution was sufficient to reduce matrix affects in samples of tomato, orange and leek juice for the quantification of 53 different pesticides (Ferrer et al, 2011). Column-switching and pre-column back-flushing is an effective method of removing PLs from the samples during analysis by determining exactly when the PLs will appear and switching to an alternative column during that time period (Ismaiel et al, 2011). PLs tend to adhere to analytical columns, especially hydrophobic columns, and can then elute later in the analysis (Kushon and Pike, 2013;Silvester and Smith, 2012), so back-flushing is used to clear the column and prevent contamination of later samples.…”
Section: Techniques For Minimizing Matrix Effects Owing To Pls Duringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A 15-fold dilution was sufficient to reduce matrix affects in samples of tomato, orange and leek juice for the quantification of 53 different pesticides (Ferrer et al, 2011). Column-switching and pre-column back-flushing is an effective method of removing PLs from the samples during analysis by determining exactly when the PLs will appear and switching to an alternative column during that time period (Ismaiel et al, 2011). PLs tend to adhere to analytical columns, especially hydrophobic columns, and can then elute later in the analysis (Kushon and Pike, 2013;Silvester and Smith, 2012), so back-flushing is used to clear the column and prevent contamination of later samples.…”
Section: Techniques For Minimizing Matrix Effects Owing To Pls Duringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLs tend to adhere to analytical columns, especially hydrophobic columns, and can then elute later in the analysis (Kushon and Pike, 2013;Silvester and Smith, 2012), so back-flushing is used to clear the column and prevent contamination of later samples. This can both extend column life and improve the quality of the analysis (Ismaiel et al, 2011). Many different solvents have been tested to determine the best choice for clearing PLs that have adhered to the column, including acetonitrile (ACN), methanol (MeOH), dichloromethane (DCM), isopropanol (IPA), chloroform, n-hexane, and various mixtures of these, some including water.…”
Section: Techniques For Minimizing Matrix Effects Owing To Pls Duringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination has been recently used by several authors to determine different types of compounds [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Compared to the conventional offline SPE and LC separation systems, these improvements are considerably valuable for analysing emerging compounds in complex environmental samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimal way of performing ''true'' global profiling would be to introduce the samples straight into a high-resolution mass spectrometer, without any pretreatment, to detect all metabolites that can be ionized. This is currently not possible due to mainly two reasons: the current mass spectrometers are unable to analyze the entire span of chemically diverse metabolites and; ion suppression/enhancement effects caused by co-occurring substances will distort the MS signal (Calbiani et al 2006;Ismaiel et al 2011). To solve these issues most researchers utilize sample preparation combined with chromatographic separation to decrease the complexity of the sample and remove substances that have a negative impact on the MS detection.…”
Section: Sampling and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a wide metabolite coverage is more likely to describe perturbation(s) of a biological system in regards to the study objective, thus relevant for the generation of a hypothesis. Nonetheless, some research groups use specific sample preparation solutions based on solid phase extraction (SPE) technology to selectively remove phospholipids, one major reason for ion suppression during plasma sample analysis (Calbiani et al 2006;Ismaiel et al 2011). It has been demonstrated that these SPE methods efficiently remove most phospholipids in plasma samples (Lahaie et al 2010;Tulipani et al 2013) and therefore, in most cases, improve metabolite coverage by reduced ion suppression/enhancement.…”
Section: Sampling and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%