1982
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198204000-00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Object Contour from Projections for Attenuation Correction in Cranial Positron Emission Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
93
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculated attenuation correction was performed on all images using the CTI/ Siemens reconstruction software. The outline of the head was derived directly from the raw data by threshold fits to the sinograms according to the method of Bergstroem et al (1982).…”
Section: Pet Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculated attenuation correction was performed on all images using the CTI/ Siemens reconstruction software. The outline of the head was derived directly from the raw data by threshold fits to the sinograms according to the method of Bergstroem et al (1982).…”
Section: Pet Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw data obtained were corrected for variations in detector efficiency, dead time , random coincidences using the observed singles rate in each detector, attenuation using a projection thresholds method (Bergstrom et aI., 1983), and scattered coincidences using a deconvolution method similar to that of Bergstrom et al (1982). Raw coincidence data were reconstructed into a 128 x 128 image matrix using the filtered back projection method.…”
Section: Determination Of Physiological Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PET images were reconstructed by a filtered back-projection method yielding an in-plane spatial resolution of 8.5 mm (FWHM) and an axial resolution of 12 mm (FWHM). Corrections were applied to the data, as described by Bergstrom et al (1982) to account for photon attenuation, scattered radi ation, and detector nonuniformity. The tissue activity concentration in the PET images was cross-calibrated against a well counter using a cylindrical phantom filled with 18F solution.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%