2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40194-020-00982-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of notch factors for welded butt joints based on numerical analysis and metamodeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative way is the use of surrogate models obtained from regression or the application of artificial neural networks (ANN) [24][25][26]38]. The ANN used for our application by Oswald et al is based on 4136 linear elastic FE-simulations of parametrized design samples and has proven high accuracy compared to former existing empirical formulas as well as a significant increase of applicable parameter ranges.…”
Section: Stress Concentration Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An alternative way is the use of surrogate models obtained from regression or the application of artificial neural networks (ANN) [24][25][26]38]. The ANN used for our application by Oswald et al is based on 4136 linear elastic FE-simulations of parametrized design samples and has proven high accuracy compared to former existing empirical formulas as well as a significant increase of applicable parameter ranges.…”
Section: Stress Concentration Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the critical value is clearly the better parameter, because the weld tends to the crack initiation at the most critical location [27]. The critical stress concentration factors are the most suitable parameters compared to the other geometrical parameters to describe the fatigue performance along a weld seam because it combines the measured parameters [24,25]. A problematic aspect of the critical value is that this value is only meaningful when all slices are taken into account.…”
Section: Fig 12: Scatter Of the Normalised Data Normalised By The Cor...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two new surrogate models based on a large amount of samples processed using FEA of transverse non-load carrying stiffeners with varying geometrical parameters of flank angle α, reference radius ρ, sheet thicknesses t 1 , t 2 , and weld seam thickness a are provided. The paper extends an already investigated and published collection of the joint types (a) cruciform joints [14], (b) butt joints [15], and (c) load carrying T-joints [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In the past, parametric SCF equations offered a quick estimation tool to determine SCFs for notched structures such as welded joints [19]; however, a number of recent studies have shown that these equations are less accurate than direct finite element (FE) calculations, see [20][21][22][23][24]. Performing direct FE calculations is, however, quite time consuming, especially for 3D weld geometries.…”
Section: Characterization Of Stress Concentrations Along Weld Seamsmentioning
confidence: 99%