2013
DOI: 10.1039/c3em30920g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of nitrate isotopic signature in waters of different sources by analysing the nitrogen and oxygen isotopic ratio

Abstract: A reference study on both the nitrogen content in waters and nitrogen and oxygen isotopic signatures characterising nitrate from different sources was conducted within the San River catchment area. Three kinds of catchments were studied: (1) forested and uncultivated; (2) artificially fertilised with nitrate; and (3) fertilised with manure and sewage. Moreover, atmospheric water was studied. The obtained values were found to be similar to others in the literature, with the exception of nitrate from the atmosph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Groundwater samples were used as the source of NO − 3 from pristine land (Deutsch et al, 2006). Their δ 15 N-NO − 3 and δ 18 O-NO − 3 values significantly differed from those of agricultural runoff (p < 0.05) but were similar to the values of other areas, such as Biscuit Brook (Burns et al, 2009) and the San River (Koszelnik and Gruca-Rokosz, 2013), where pristine soils were sampled and reflect nitrification activity in soils unaffected by human activity.…”
Section: F Korth Et Al: Nitrate Source Identification In the Balticmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Groundwater samples were used as the source of NO − 3 from pristine land (Deutsch et al, 2006). Their δ 15 N-NO − 3 and δ 18 O-NO − 3 values significantly differed from those of agricultural runoff (p < 0.05) but were similar to the values of other areas, such as Biscuit Brook (Burns et al, 2009) and the San River (Koszelnik and Gruca-Rokosz, 2013), where pristine soils were sampled and reflect nitrification activity in soils unaffected by human activity.…”
Section: F Korth Et Al: Nitrate Source Identification In the Balticmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similar δ 15 N-NO − 3 values were reported for areas where pristine soils were also sampled. For example, δ 15 N-NO − 3 and δ 18 O-NO − 3 values of 1.9 and 2.8 ‰ were determined for Biscuit Bay (Burns et al, 2009) and 2.9 and 2.8 ‰ for the San River (Koszelnik and Gruca-Rokosz, 2013), respectively. The higher δ 18 O-NO − 3 values of the Kalix River can, as discussed above, be attributed to atmospheric deposition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, oxygen isotope may be not effectively used to identify nitrate sources derived from human activities but may be used to distinguish nitrate derived from unprocessed atmospheric nitrate from nitrogen biochemical processes such as nitrification. Koszelnik and Gruca-Rokosz (2013), for example, argued that NO 3 − from wells and ditches located in hardwood forests was derived from the soil where nitrification generated δ 18 O-NO 3 − values in the range of those typically associated with nitrification. Similarly, Tobari et al (2010) estimated the contribution of atmospheric NO 3 − in streams draining forest watersheds in Japan by using O isotopes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The above analyses suggest that nitrate pollution in the river basin might be mainly sourced from the use of chemical fertilizer and pesticide in the agricultural areas, domestic sewage and industrial wastewater discharge. Fertilizer is one of the main sources of nitrate pollution in the studied waters, which has a great impact on the water quality in the study area [3,42]. Furthermore, about 5%-10% of applied fertilizer can enter into groundwater [43].…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Nitrate and Its Controlling Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%