Determination of Mortar Strength in Historical Brick Masonry Using the Penetrometer Test and Double Punch Test

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the minor destructive testing of mortars in masonry structures of four buildings erected at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. The buildings were erected in the historical centre of Cracow. The objective of testing was to determine mortar compressive strength in masonry joints. The in situ tests were carried out with the use of a penetrometer RSM-15 with the standardised impact energy equalling 4.55 nm. Laboratory tests on mortar specimens taken from the structures were also performed. The double punch test method was used in the laboratory tests. On account of the specificity of the tested historical mortars, the typical procedures used in penetrometer and double punch tests were modified. For penetrometer tests, a new feature called “a surface disturbance zone” was introduced. Additionally, a procedure for determining a surface disturbance zone range was included. As confirmed in the paper, the consideration of the surface disturbance zone in the analysis of test results is crucial for the correct evaluation of mortar compressive strength. The thicknesses of bed joints in the tested historical masonry considerably exceeded the requirements included in the standard EN 1996-1-1. Thus, the thickness of the mortar specimens taken from historical masonry for the double punch tests clearly exceeded the thickness of specimens extracted from the typical structures erected nowadays. This article provides a method of considering a specimen thickness parameter in the analysis of double punch test results. The in situ test results with the use of penetrometer and double punch methods confirmed that the mortar strength in tested historical buildings ranged from 1.4 to 2.9 MPa. Mortar compressive strength values determined by both applied methods were similar.

Prediction of Mortar Compressive Strength Based on Modern Minor-Destructive Tests

“…The main advantage of this test is the direct measurement of the mortar’s mechanical properties. A negative feature of this test is the high susceptibility of its result to a range of factors, such as specimen slenderness [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], a manner in which the surface is leveled [ 20 , 21 ], the shape and diameter of steel punches [ 16 ] or the presence of large aggregate grains [ 22 ]. In addition, in the case of walls with good adhesiveness between brick and mortar, extracting specimens is really difficult or even impossible.…”

“…The number of correlation functions between mortar strength acc. to DPT test ( f m.DPT ) and mortar reference strength ( f m ) is very limited, and some attempts were made in [ 16 , 22 , 23 ].…”

Investigation on Alamparai Fort by utilization of organic materials for improvement of stability of heritage structure

“…The acid dissolution test [17] found that the su cient ratio of lime mortar and sand mixture for the sample is 1:3 (Lime: Fine aggregate) from The mechanical characteristics of mortars rely upon the binder type and its mix ratio [18,19] addressed that in accommodating lime mortar pores, the B/A is a critical parameter and directly affects disseminating CO 2 in the lime matrix. In his ten books of architecture, Vitruvius, chapter IV [20] claimed that lime mortar of 1: 3 mix ratio is excellent for higher carbonation.…”

Towards Characterization of Indoor Environment in Smart Buildings: Modelling PMV Index Using Neural Network with One Hidden Layer

“…The indicator for the absolute value of the network output ( y NNi |) guarantees that each of them will be in the range of Absolute Relative Error from zero to maximum absolute Relative Error [77,78]. Consequently, it gives information about the absolute value of the maximum possible error of the mathematical model [79][80][81] represented by the already taught neural network. This criterion only includes data for the testing stage.…”