2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.c035171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Model Structure from Flight Test with Generalized Additive Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the authors of [24] compared a GAM with linear regression in order to predict aviation weather parameters. In [25], GAMs were explored because of their ability to provide information on the significance of each individual feature. The data employed in this study are flight test data, with the objective of having a physical interpretation of an aerodynamic model.…”
Section: Applications Of the Gam And The State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the authors of [24] compared a GAM with linear regression in order to predict aviation weather parameters. In [25], GAMs were explored because of their ability to provide information on the significance of each individual feature. The data employed in this study are flight test data, with the objective of having a physical interpretation of an aerodynamic model.…”
Section: Applications Of the Gam And The State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System identification in the time-domain can be implemented using several methods such as the equation error method (EEM) [3,8,9,[14][15][16][17], the output error method [8,9,14], the filter error method [8,18], and artificial neural networks [3,19,20]. Computational software tools such as FVSysID [8] and SIDPAC [9], running under MATLAB, are available for system identification [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%