2008
DOI: 10.2140/jomms.2008.3.1239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of mode I stress intensity factors of complex configurations using strain gages

Abstract: Among techniques for the determination of the mode I stress intensity factors (SIFs), strain gage procedures are the simplest and most straightforward. We report here on an experimental investigation of the determination of opening mode stress intensity factors using the single strain gage method. Our approach overcomes certain drawbacks and greatly widens the applicability of strain gage methods in the determination of static SIFs of complex configurations. The approach was tested through experiments on speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radial position of the strain gage r = 3 mm was chosen in all tests based on the stress gradient analysis presented in [12]. Figure 4 and 5 show a comparison between the results of SIF as a function of the applied load measured experimentally [9] and obtained by the proposed model for a/w = 0.3 and 0.5 with h/w = 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0. The figures show that the measured SIF are linearly proportional with the applied load.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The radial position of the strain gage r = 3 mm was chosen in all tests based on the stress gradient analysis presented in [12]. Figure 4 and 5 show a comparison between the results of SIF as a function of the applied load measured experimentally [9] and obtained by the proposed model for a/w = 0.3 and 0.5 with h/w = 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0. The figures show that the measured SIF are linearly proportional with the applied load.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where A 0 , A 1 and B 0 are unknown coefficients which can be determined by using the specimen geometry and boundary conditions. Using the definition of K I , one can easily show that it is related to A 0 by [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]:…”
Section: Basic Theory and Mathematical Formulation Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The user can select the smallest practicable gage length, but needs to be aware of the greatly increased error and uncertainty in the indicated strains due to the nature of the gage and instrumentations. It is worth noting that using relatively large strain gages enhance the accuracy of measuring strain at a high strain gradient [19]. Case 3: In this case, both the gage length (l g =0.5) and width (w=0.5) are held constant while the horizontal distance from the hole's edge to the first filament is varied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%