2021
DOI: 10.3390/foods10102272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Material Requirements for 3D Gel Food Printing Using a Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printer

Abstract: The material requirements for printing gel food with a fused deposition modeling 3D printer were determined based on fidelity, shape retention, and extrudability, as described by the rheological parameters of storage modulus (G’), yield stress (τ0), and phase angle (δ). The material requirements were determined for printing gel food using three formulations containing gelatin, gelatin and pectin, and gum mixture as the gelling agents. As compared with formulations based on gelatin alone, pectin-containing gela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 shows the viscoelastic modulus (G′ and G″) and complex viscosity (η*) curves of the gels enriched with different concentrations of apricot pulp before 3D printing. Considering the viscoelastic properties of the gel ( Figure 1 a), the storage modulus G′ of the apricot pulp printing inks was higher than the loss modulus G″ throughout the studied frequency range for all samples, and the loss tangent (Tan δ) values for all apricot gel samples were less than 1, suggesting that all the gels with apricot pulp showed dominant elastic behavior [ 26 ]. The G′ and G″ values of the gels increased as a higher concentration of apricot pulp was added, indicating that the addition of apricot pulp modified the viscoelastic behavior of the gels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 shows the viscoelastic modulus (G′ and G″) and complex viscosity (η*) curves of the gels enriched with different concentrations of apricot pulp before 3D printing. Considering the viscoelastic properties of the gel ( Figure 1 a), the storage modulus G′ of the apricot pulp printing inks was higher than the loss modulus G″ throughout the studied frequency range for all samples, and the loss tangent (Tan δ) values for all apricot gel samples were less than 1, suggesting that all the gels with apricot pulp showed dominant elastic behavior [ 26 ]. The G′ and G″ values of the gels increased as a higher concentration of apricot pulp was added, indicating that the addition of apricot pulp modified the viscoelastic behavior of the gels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The G′ and G″ values of the gels increased as a higher concentration of apricot pulp was added, indicating that the addition of apricot pulp modified the viscoelastic behavior of the gels. This increase could be associated with the ability of the sugar to attract and bind water molecules, increasing the firmness of the gel [ 26 ], with G70 being the sample most resistant to deformation. Similar results have been observed by other authors working with blueberry gelatin gels and mango jam, in which an increase in G′ and G″ moduli were observed with respect to the control [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to protein molecule at the isoelectric point, the positive and negative charges are balanced, causing the reduce in repulsive electrostatic forces, the attractive forces increase, which cause the aggregation and precipitation. There are few researches that were successfully develop and formulated gelatin‐based biofilm (Gholamipour‐Shirazi et al., 2020; In et al., 2021; Sancakli et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021). There is still lack of research about the mechanism of action and stability of gelatin in 3D food printing formulation that are using Bovidae‐based gelatin.…”
Section: Future Trend Of Bovidae‐based Gelatinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paste needs to be shear thinning to allow for flow through a narrow syringe with a high enough yield stress to allow for the printed structure to hold itself up on the build plate. On the same time, the paste needs to match previous formulations that have been found suitable for dysphagia patients when it comes to rheological properties as well as nutritional (Wegrzyn et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2017;García-Segovia et al, 2020;He et al, 2020;Dick et al, 2021b;In et al, 2021;Jeon et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2022a). Printability of different pastes, and what is commonly known as the printability window, is most often assessed through rheological characterization of the viscoelastic and flow behavior coupled with image analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%