2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of mass transfer coefficients for packing materials used in biofilters and biotrickling filters for air pollution control. 1. Experimental results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
52
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
11
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This significant difference between the two loading patterns indicates that it is the residence time of hydrocarbons within the reactor (and, presumably, contact with the biofilm) that limits biofilter performance. This feature may indicate mass transfer limitations at low EBRT, as it often does in biofiltration (Kim and Deshusses, 2008). However, setting up the same loading at a lower residence time would also lead to lower substrate concentrations not only in the gas phase but also in the condensed phase, as a result of partitioning.…”
Section: Pollutant Switch From Gasoline To Diesel Hydrocarbonsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This significant difference between the two loading patterns indicates that it is the residence time of hydrocarbons within the reactor (and, presumably, contact with the biofilm) that limits biofilter performance. This feature may indicate mass transfer limitations at low EBRT, as it often does in biofiltration (Kim and Deshusses, 2008). However, setting up the same loading at a lower residence time would also lead to lower substrate concentrations not only in the gas phase but also in the condensed phase, as a result of partitioning.…”
Section: Pollutant Switch From Gasoline To Diesel Hydrocarbonsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In such gasliquid-liquid processes, the mass transfer coefficient K L a is a key parameter in estimating reactor performance [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The mass transfer mechanism depends upon the dynamics of the system in which it occurs [12] but, in the case of TPPBs, the K L a change due to the addition of a nonaqueous phase (NAP) to the aqueous phase seems difficult to predict.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous researchers who have done modelling in the process of gas and liquid waste handling using biofilters include Spigno et al [18] in the elimination of phenol, Majumder et al [19] in the process of removal of divalent copper dissolved in water, Jaber et al [20] in modelling bio-filters for hydrogen sulphide contained in the air, Meena et al [21] makes the mathematical modelling of the separation of a mixture of hydrophilic (methanol) and hydrophobic (α-Pinene), Santos et al [22] used a mathematical model for the removal of hydrogen sulphide by oxidation in the bio-filter, Kim and Deshusses [23] calculate the mass transfer coefficient on the packing material used for bio-filter, either in the gas layer or the liquid layer. Furthermore Yang et al [24] makes modelling of porosity variations of bio-filter equipment used in rotary drum, Ramirez et al [25] studied the kinetics of microbial growth and biodegradation of methanol and toluene, De Visscher and Li [26] studied the disappearances modelling toluene contained in the air, Agarwal et al [27] studied the mass balance for phenol degradation events.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%