2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep14114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of magnetic anisotropy constants and domain wall pinning energy of Fe/MgO(001) ultrathin film by anisotropic magnetoresistance

Abstract: It is challenging to determine domain wall pinning energy and magnetic anisotropy since both coherent rotation and domain wall displacement coexist during magnetization switching process. Here, angular dependence anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) measurements at different magnetic fields were employed to determine magnetic anisotropy constants and domain wall pinning energy of Fe/MgO(001) ultrathin film. The AMR curves at magnetic fields which are high enough to ensure the coherent rotation of magnetization … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples were prepared via molecular beam epitaxy with a chamber base pressure of 2 10 10´mbar [25]. Prior to deposition, MgO(001) substrates were annealed at 700°C for 2 h. 6 nm Fe films were then deposited using an electron-beam gun, followed by the deposition of Pd films, labeled as Pd(t Pd )/Fe(6 nm), where t Pd indicates the Pd thickness in nanometers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Samples were prepared via molecular beam epitaxy with a chamber base pressure of 2 10 10´mbar [25]. Prior to deposition, MgO(001) substrates were annealed at 700°C for 2 h. 6 nm Fe films were then deposited using an electron-beam gun, followed by the deposition of Pd films, labeled as Pd(t Pd )/Fe(6 nm), where t Pd indicates the Pd thickness in nanometers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been revealed that the films were grown with the epitaxial relationship Pd(001)〈110〉||Fe(001)〈100〉||MgO(001)〈110〉 (see the inset of figure 1(b)). For comparison, the reference sample, a 6 nm Fe film, was also prepared on MgO(001) substrate with Fe(001)〈100〉|| MgO(001)〈110〉 [25]. 3.5 nm Cu was deposited nonepitaxially on the Fe film to prevent the oxidation of Fe atoms [26][27][28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with the easy direction along the [1 0 0] crystal direction of the Fe film (see figure 4). In general, the com petition between fourfold and twofold anisotropy contrib utions depends on different parameters [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], intrinsic ones such as angle of deposition [25,30], substrate morphologhy [27][28][29]32], and ferromagnetic thicknesses [27,29,31] and, or extrinsic ones, such as temperature. With respect to the latter, different temperaturedependent strength would result in a spinreorientation transition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work reported that the Fe thin films on MgO(001) substrates have four-fold symmetry with strong magnetic anisotropy. [45] Figure 6(a) clearly shows that the angle dependent normalized remanence of the normally deposited (α = 0 • ) sample exhibits four-fold symmetry. When the Fe film thickness is large (50 ML), the four-fold cubic anisotropy is dominant to the UMA caused by oblique deposition.…”
Section: Moke Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%