2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of latent hardening response for FeNiCoCrMn for twin-twin interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WHR of AM SS 316 L rapidly decreases and remain almost constant around 1000 MPa, whereas AM CrCoNi shows a rapid decrease, rather increases (Stage II), and gradually decreases until fracture. The four-stage response has been known as a characteristic of low SFE fcc metals and the stage II often includes primary twinning and its migration 36,37 and/or martensitic transformation 38 . Besides, the necking criterion (dσ/dε = σ) predicts a delayed necking occurrence of AM CrCoNi (38%) compared to the AM SS 316 L (33%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The WHR of AM SS 316 L rapidly decreases and remain almost constant around 1000 MPa, whereas AM CrCoNi shows a rapid decrease, rather increases (Stage II), and gradually decreases until fracture. The four-stage response has been known as a characteristic of low SFE fcc metals and the stage II often includes primary twinning and its migration 36,37 and/or martensitic transformation 38 . Besides, the necking criterion (dσ/dε = σ) predicts a delayed necking occurrence of AM CrCoNi (38%) compared to the AM SS 316 L (33%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical twinning stress (σ tw ) is described as an equivalent stress of importance to form sufficient stacking faults followed by the measureable deformation twins 8,37 . Several theoretical or phenomenological approaches have determined the σ tw using TEM 8,9 , neutron diffraction 12 or first-principle calculation based on energy barriers of stacking/twin faults 10,37 . It has been estimated for the CrCoNi alloy as 790 ± 100 MPa using TEM 9 , 890 MPa by first-principle calculation 10 , and 680-770 MPa by a numerical model by Steinmetz et al 36…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SFEs of fcc austenitic steels, particularly of high-Mn steels, have empirically been known to correlate with their deformation behaviors [63][64][65][66][67]. Also for 3d-transitionelement-based HEAs, their SFEs have also been measured in experiments [8,17,26,[68][69][70][71] and computed based on firstprinciples simulations [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84]. While the impact of C atoms on the SFEs of HEAs has also been discussed in experimental fcc hcp FIG.…”
Section: A Stacking-fault Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key factor in controlling the underlying deformation mechanism and therewith tuning the mechanical properties is the stacking fault energy (SFE). Low SFEs can induce, e.g., transformation- induced plasticity (TRIP) or twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], and for this reason, SFEs of HEAs and CCAs have been investigated previously in numerous experimental [ 13 , 17 , 18 , 19 ] as well as theoretical studies [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Interestingly, in a recent experimental work [ 17 ], the measured SFEs for equiatomic CrMnFeCoNi revealed large fluctuations, and it was proposed that the SFEs of CrMnFeCoNi may sensitively depend on the local chemical environments in the vicinity of the stacking faults (SFs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%