1975
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(75)90113-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of irreversible absorption of water by cellulose filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tierney and Conner (1967) concluded that the effect of relative humidity (RH) on glass fibre filters was insignificant, but at RH > 55 % the effect on collected particulates was significant. Demuynck (1975) demonstrated that during 1 h high volume sampling in an urban area on a foggy day the amount of water irreversibly retained by cellulose filters is comparable to or even higher than the mass of particulate matter collected. Brown et al (2006) compared the behaviour of quartz fibre, glass fibre and PTFE-bonded glass fibre under different RH conditions and found that the deviation in mass of certain unexposed 47 mm filters exceeded 450 µg while the RH ranged between 30 and 81 %.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Tierney and Conner (1967) concluded that the effect of relative humidity (RH) on glass fibre filters was insignificant, but at RH > 55 % the effect on collected particulates was significant. Demuynck (1975) demonstrated that during 1 h high volume sampling in an urban area on a foggy day the amount of water irreversibly retained by cellulose filters is comparable to or even higher than the mass of particulate matter collected. Brown et al (2006) compared the behaviour of quartz fibre, glass fibre and PTFE-bonded glass fibre under different RH conditions and found that the deviation in mass of certain unexposed 47 mm filters exceeded 450 µg while the RH ranged between 30 and 81 %.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Tierney and Conner () concluded that the effect of RH on glass fiber filters was insignificant, but at RH > 55% the effect on collected particulates was significant. Demuynck () demonstrated that the amount of water irreversibly retained by cellulose filters is comparable to or even higher than the mass of particulate matter collected during the foggy day. In addition, the particulate mass collected in 1 hr is small; thus, the bias caused by water may be excessive.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tierney and Conner (1967) concluded that the effect of RH on glass fiber filters was insignificant, but at RH > 55% the effect on collected particulates was significant. Demuynck (1975) demonstrated that the amount of water irreversibly retained by cellulose filters is comparable to or even higher than the mass of particulate matter 10.1029/2018JD029269…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Atmospheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this material is carbon-based, these filters are inappropriate for carbon analysis. Cellulose-fiber filters have low and variable filtration efficiency (~70%) [ 92 ] and they absorb water, which can cause filter-weighing biases unless the balance environment maintains a constant relative humidity (RH) [ 93 ]. These filters are best used for absorbing gases after being impregnated with acid or base solutions.…”
Section: Filter Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%