1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0379-7112(97)00064-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of interface height from measured parameter profile in enclosure fire experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, the n-percent method has been one of the most extended methods to determine the free smoke height [6,28], due to the ease of calculation. On the other hand, the least-square method is neither dependent on any parameter nor empirical correlations [22]. This method, applied to the smoke temperature, establishes the smoke layer interface where the deviation (r d ) of the temperature at the smoke layer interface is minimum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On one hand, the n-percent method has been one of the most extended methods to determine the free smoke height [6,28], due to the ease of calculation. On the other hand, the least-square method is neither dependent on any parameter nor empirical correlations [22]. This method, applied to the smoke temperature, establishes the smoke layer interface where the deviation (r d ) of the temperature at the smoke layer interface is minimum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Wall A. Twelve thermocouples were installed in three thermocouple trees to measure the temperature at 30 cm from the wall A (sensors [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as can be observed in Figure 2c. These measurements are used to study the smoke temperature at the far field and the smoke layer drop.…”
Section: Fire Experiments and Simulations In A Full-scale Atrium 53mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the least-squares method [28], the lower layer and upper layer temperatures (T and u T ) are defined at the doorway as:…”
Section: Experimental Results and Validation Of The Fire Model Experimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a field model like FDS, there are not two distinct zones, but rather a continuous profile of temperature. There are several methods that have been developed to estimate smoke layer height and average temperatures from a continuous vertical profile of temperature (see [7]). The method chosen by NIST is as follows (see [5]):…”
Section: Heat Release Ratementioning
confidence: 99%