2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-3003-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of importance for comprehensive topographic factors on landslide hazard mapping using artificial neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the validation of the landslide susceptibility maps, the RBF kernel produced AUC values, indicating the accuracy of the landslide susceptibility maps, and these were 81.36% for the PyeongChang area, and 77.49% for the Inje area (Figure 7). There were some differences in accuracy between the study areas, because the previous studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][29][30][31][32][33] showed that the spatial distribution is subject to change, according to the area and event. However, the accuracy was usually high enough, displaying figures of above 80%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the validation of the landslide susceptibility maps, the RBF kernel produced AUC values, indicating the accuracy of the landslide susceptibility maps, and these were 81.36% for the PyeongChang area, and 77.49% for the Inje area (Figure 7). There were some differences in accuracy between the study areas, because the previous studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][29][30][31][32][33] showed that the spatial distribution is subject to change, according to the area and event. However, the accuracy was usually high enough, displaying figures of above 80%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, recent case studies have frequently applied soft computing technology to the assessment of landslide hazards. When creating soft computing models, artificial neural networks [2][3][4][5][6], neuro-fuzzy logic [2,[7][8][9], decision trees [10][11][12][13][14][15], and support vector machines (SVMs) [10,[15][16][17][18][19], have been applied in order to analyze landslide landslide susceptibility. Among the many soft computing models, SVMs were applied in the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding earth surface processes relies on modern digital terrain representations and depends strongly on the quality of the topographic data (Tarolli et al 2009). Digital elevation model (DEM) was used as a basic data source to extract topographic data (Alkhasawneh et al 2014).…”
Section: Data Fusion Of Ground Measurements and Satellite Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpolation methods are used to estimate the unknown elevation value of grid cells from known points according to different geometry or physical mechanisms (Yue 2011). Classical spatial interpolation methods such as triangulated irregular network with linear interpolation (TIN), spline, inverse distance weighted (IDW) and kriging could satisfy many practical applications in environmental modelling, whereas applications such as hydrological modelling, and landslide hazard mapping, etc., are demanding DEM surfaces with higher accuracy (Alkhasawneh et al 2014;Blöschl and Sivapalan 1995). To further improve the accuracy of interpolated DEM surface and satisfy these accuracy-demanding applications, high-accuracy surface modelling (HASM) method was developed with the foundation of the first and second fundamental coefficients (Yue et al 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%