1990
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600790620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Ibuprofen Vapor Pressure at Temperatures of Pharmaceutical Interest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
29
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
5
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The available literature data as well as a few new measurements are summarized in Table 1. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The enthalpies reported in Table 1 are all temperature dependent and all are reported at the temperatures noted in the table. As many of the measurements including the activation energy, vaporization, and sublimation enthalpy data have been measured at highly divergent temperatures, comparison of the consistency of these measurements is problematic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The available literature data as well as a few new measurements are summarized in Table 1. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The enthalpies reported in Table 1 are all temperature dependent and all are reported at the temperatures noted in the table. As many of the measurements including the activation energy, vaporization, and sublimation enthalpy data have been measured at highly divergent temperatures, comparison of the consistency of these measurements is problematic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations for the adjustment of phase transition enthalpies have been developed and are summarized as vap Hm(298 K) = sub Hm(298 K) − fus Hm(298 K) (1) sub Hm(298 K)/kJ · mol −1 = sub Hm(T m ) + 0.75 + 0.15 × C p (c) (T m − 298.15)/1000 (2) vap Hm(298 K)/kJ · mol −1 = vap Hm(T m ) + 10.58 + 0.26 C p (l) (T m − 298.15)/1000 (3) fus Hm(298 K)/kJ · mol −1 = fus Hm(T m ) + [0.15C p (c) − 0.26C p (l) − 9.93] (Tfus − 298.15) /1000 (4) Equation 1 is a thermodynamic equality used to evaluate vaporization enthalpies from the corresponding sublimation and fusion enthalpy provided that all enthalpies are adjusted to a common temperature. Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De la misma forma se observa que en todos los casos la solubilidad experimental del IBP es mayor que la del NAP, lo cual es consistente con lo esperado de acuerdo a la solubilidad ideal (0,268 y 0,0833 para IBP y NAP a 25,0 °C, respectivamente 20,21 ); esto es, de acuerdo con las propiedades físicas de los fármacos en el estado sólido, ya que las entalpías y las temperaturas de fusión son mayores para el NAP respecto al IBP (Tabla 1) y por lo tanto, la tendencia hacia el estado líquido es mayor en el caso del IBP. Es necesario aclarar que bajo las condiciones cosolventes estudiadas aquí, la disociación de estos dos fármacos es mínima, con lo que se tiene que la solubilidad total presentada por éstos, corresponde prácticamente en su totalidad a la de la forma molecular no disociada, y por lo tanto se trataría de la solubilidad intrínseca 13 .…”
Section: Resultados Y Discusiónunclassified
“…A correction for ∆H MELT to account for the difference of the heat capacities at the melting and at room temperature was not necessary. The enthalpy of sublimation (∆H SUB ) was taken from the work of Ertel et al, 32 who determined ∆H SUB from a sublimation pressure versus 1/T plot to be 121.00 kJ/mol. The enthalpy of the gas-liquid phase transition shown in Figure 1 was calculated with the help of the Hess theorem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%