2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01102.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of PRKAG1 coding sequence and mapping of PRKAG1 and PRKAG2 relatively to porcine back fat thickness QTL

Abstract: PRKAG1, PRKAG2 and PRKAG3 encode three isoforms of AMP-activated protein kinase gamma chain. A major effect on meat quality and a medium effect on back fat thickness of the RN- mutation in the PRKAG3 gene has previously been reported. We have now mapped PRKAG1 and PRKAG2 at expected locations on SSC5 and SSC18 by analysis of radiation hybrids (IMpRH panel). PRKAG2 has been mapped in a region where no quantitative trait loci (QTL) has been reported. PRKAG1 has been mapped close to (but probably outside) a regio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because we have not yet investigated protein levels of the different AMPK subunits, it seems premature to relate differences in transcriptional level to those observed for muscle glycogen content between chicken lines. Regarding the γ1 AMPK subunit, whose gene expression differed between the fat and lean line, it is worthy to note that in pork the gene encoding for it (PRKAG1) is mapped close to a region containing a QTL influencing fatness traits, suggesting possible involvement in the determination of body composition in this species (Demeure et al, 2004). The expression of several genes coding for enzymes involved in the synthesis and degradation of glycogen (Figure 1) were assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because we have not yet investigated protein levels of the different AMPK subunits, it seems premature to relate differences in transcriptional level to those observed for muscle glycogen content between chicken lines. Regarding the γ1 AMPK subunit, whose gene expression differed between the fat and lean line, it is worthy to note that in pork the gene encoding for it (PRKAG1) is mapped close to a region containing a QTL influencing fatness traits, suggesting possible involvement in the determination of body composition in this species (Demeure et al, 2004). The expression of several genes coding for enzymes involved in the synthesis and degradation of glycogen (Figure 1) were assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonsignificant putative QTL identified for tenth rib and average backfat thicknesses by sib-pair analysis were located within the same marker interval as the QTL identified by outbred F 2 analysis (Table 5). Demeure et al (2004) reported that the gene encoding for an isoform of AMP-activated protein kinase γ chain, PRKAG2, believed to affect backfat thickness was mapped to SSC 18. The PRKAG2 gene has been mapped to a location with no statistically significant evidence for QTL; however, it is possible that the candidate gene may influence backfat measurements in other populations (Bidanel and Rothschild, 2002).…”
Section: Chromosome 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this study, the significant associations of E36 with backfat depth traits were mainly observed in live animals (Table 4). This could have occurred if the region harboring the IFRD1 gene contained other genes that affect carcass backfat traits, such as IGFBP3 (insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3) (Wu et al 2002;Wang et al 2009) and PRKAG2 (protein kinase, AMPactivated, gamma 2 non-catalytic subunit) (Demeure et al 2004). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%