2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02104.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination ofde novoand pool emissions of terpenes from four common boreal/alpine trees by13CO2labelling and PTR-MS analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm fitting was conducted using MATLAB function ‘lsqcurvefit’ which allows using initial values as a reasonable starting point for the algorithm fitting ( E 0 =0.1 ng g −1 s −1 , f synth = 0.5, applied based on the results by Ghirardo et al . and Taipale et al . ) and returns also 95% confidence intervals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The algorithm fitting was conducted using MATLAB function ‘lsqcurvefit’ which allows using initial values as a reasonable starting point for the algorithm fitting ( E 0 =0.1 ng g −1 s −1 , f synth = 0.5, applied based on the results by Ghirardo et al . and Taipale et al . ) and returns also 95% confidence intervals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This temperature dependence relates especially to emissions originating from storage pools, which in case of conifer foliage are quite large (Ghirardo et al . ; Niinemets et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S5B). This is likely due to a high percentage of de novo biosynthesized monoterpenes which have been shown to constitute up to 58% of emitted monoterpenes in Pinus sylvestris 56. Emitted monoterpenes represent a mix of stored (temperature dependent) and de novo synthesized (light and temperature dependent) monoterpenes57 which may consequently contribute to the lack of a relationship between pool sizes and rates of emission and large variation in emission rates (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of the PTR-MS operating parameters and analytical procedures used in the present study are given elsewhere (Ghirardo et al , 2010). Briefly, the PTR-MS was run with the following parameters: E/N = 110 Td (E = electric field; N = number of density of the drift tube molecules; Td = 1 Townsend = 10 −17 cm 2 V molecule −1 ), p-drift = 1.73 mbar, T = 43 °C, V = 400, O 2 + and NO + < 2% of H 3 O + .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%