2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4975353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of hole g-factor in InAs/InGaAs/InAlAs quantum wells by magneto-photoluminescence studies

Abstract: Circularly-polarized magneto-photoluminescence (magneto-PL) technique has been applied to investigate Zeeman effect in InAs/InGaAs/InAlAs quantum wells (QWs) in Faraday geometry. Structures with different thickness of the QW barriers have been studied in magnetic field parallel and tilted with respect to the sample normal. Effective electron-hole g-factor has been found by measurement of splitting of polarized magneto-PL lines. Landé factors of electrons have been calculated using the 14-band k · p method and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of six fit parameters in Table 1, g-factors have the most immediate physical interpretation. However, the g-factors values of g eff x x = 30.8 ± 0.8 and g eff y y = 17.8 ± 0.8 are considerably larger compared to the ones used in the literature, where a range of values 3-11 was reported [61][62][63][64]. We note, that comparable values of g-factor can be obtained from the qualitative model in Ref.…”
Section: Materials Parameters and Prediction For Dos And Gapless Regimesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Out of six fit parameters in Table 1, g-factors have the most immediate physical interpretation. However, the g-factors values of g eff x x = 30.8 ± 0.8 and g eff y y = 17.8 ± 0.8 are considerably larger compared to the ones used in the literature, where a range of values 3-11 was reported [61][62][63][64]. We note, that comparable values of g-factor can be obtained from the qualitative model in Ref.…”
Section: Materials Parameters and Prediction For Dos And Gapless Regimesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…[45]) and resulting parameters for the QW materials. PL data in a 4 nm InAs QW with In 0.75 Al 0.25 As barriers in the photon energy range of 0.58 to 0.72 eV [44]. We note, however, that none of these particular structures would allow one to achieve optimum conditions for routing because the lattice mismatch between the active region (QW or quantum dots) and the surrounding matrix (barriers) produces strain which increases the splitting between the heavy-and light-holes ∆ lh and thus reduces P c .…”
Section: Tmrle In Non-magnetic Qw Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Zeeman splitting can differ by an order of magnitude for the in-plane and out-of-plane directions of B. 14,[41][42][43][44][45][46] (See also Refs. 47-52 for related work on quantum wires.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%