2014
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.611-612.643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of High Strain-Rate Behavior of Metals: Applications to Magnetic Pulse Forming and Electrohydraulic Forming

Abstract: The design of processes like magnetic pulse forming and electrohydraulic forming involves multiphysical couplings that require numerical simulation, and knowledge on dynamic behaviour of metals. The forming process is completed in about 100 μs, so that the workpiece material deforms at strain-rates between 100 and 10 000 s-1. In this range, the mechanical behaviour can be significantly different than that in quasi-static conditions. It is often noticed that the strength and the formability are higher. The main… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the process of explosion, impact, etc., strain rate of the material can reach 10 2 -10 4 s -1 or even higher. The mechanical behavior of many metals under high strain rates is significantly different from that under quasi-static loads [1]. The constitutive relationship of material relates the relationship between stress and strain, strain rate, temperature, deformation history, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of explosion, impact, etc., strain rate of the material can reach 10 2 -10 4 s -1 or even higher. The mechanical behavior of many metals under high strain rates is significantly different from that under quasi-static loads [1]. The constitutive relationship of material relates the relationship between stress and strain, strain rate, temperature, deformation history, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation also highlights the definite requirement of the material calibration for respective strain rates. More information on the material calibration using ring expansion test could be found elsewhere [32][33][34][35]. The discrepancy could also arise from the numerical conditions such as mesh convergence and the time step used in this study.…”
Section: Validation Of Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%