1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01117612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of grain size and lattice distortions in ground YBa2Cu3O7

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most commonly the crystallite size is determined by the Scherrer formula. 31 However, this technique only takes account of the effect of the small size but neglects the strain effect, thus the result is only useful for considering trends in the change of crystallite size with milling conditions. Considering a combination of both crystallite size and lattice strain, the relationship between the peak width and the two effects is governed by following equation: 32 where B is the peak width at half the maximum intensity, θ is the Bragg angle, d is the crystallite size, λ is the wavelength of the X-radiation used, and η is the strain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commonly the crystallite size is determined by the Scherrer formula. 31 However, this technique only takes account of the effect of the small size but neglects the strain effect, thus the result is only useful for considering trends in the change of crystallite size with milling conditions. Considering a combination of both crystallite size and lattice strain, the relationship between the peak width and the two effects is governed by following equation: 32 where B is the peak width at half the maximum intensity, θ is the Bragg angle, d is the crystallite size, λ is the wavelength of the X-radiation used, and η is the strain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into consideration the fact that in the analysis results for the surrounding host rocks in FZB1136 and for all samples in FZB1194 and FZB1243, almost 100 wt.% of the samples were fitted by standard patterns, the size of the unfitted component, 34.5 wt.%, of the PSZ sample suggests the presence of a material with no or weak diffraction intensity. In accordance with the Scherrer equation, weak diffraction intensity of minerals is generally attributed not only to lattice distortions but also to reductions of particle size to the submicrometer to nanometer range [e.g., Lönnberg and Lundström , ]. However, not only these factors but also the presence of an amorphous surface layer, called the Beilby layer, with a thickness of 30–60 nm [ Gibb et al ., ] can contribute to weak intensity in the case of damaged quartz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, large amount of well-rounded spheroidal ultrafine particles ranging in size from submicrometer to several tens of nanometers, were observed only in the black gouge ( Figure 5). Because weak X-ray diffraction intensity of minerals could be attributed not only to lattice distortions but also to reductions of particle size to the submicrometer to nanometer range (e.g., Lönnberg and Lundström 1994), the 'missing' mineral content in the XRD analysis of black gouge sample FZ06 could be attributed to the observed ultrafine particles. Sun and McDonough (1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%