1980
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)93714-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of glutamate pyruvate transaminase and pyruvate with an amperometric pyruvate oxidase sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Covalent attachment on the surface of electrodeposited polytyramine EDC and NHS or Glutaraldehyde (À) Electrochemical entrapment throughout polytyramine followed by covalent attachment EDC and NHS (À) Electrochemical entrapment of enzyme throughout polytyramine Without covalent attachment (À) SAM using thiol EDC and NHS (À) Covalent attachment onto the surface of polytyramine in humid conditions EDC or Glutaraldehyde () The concentrations of cofactors used to measure pyruvate in this study (2 mM TPP, 2 mM FAD and 1 mM MgCl 2 ) were consistent with previous reports for entrapped pyruvate oxidase [14,15,37]. The optimal pH in a buffer of 0.01 M Trizma and 0.04 M phosphate was found to be 7.2 in common with other studies [14,15].…”
Section: Enzyme Immobilization Methods Crosslinking Agents Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Covalent attachment on the surface of electrodeposited polytyramine EDC and NHS or Glutaraldehyde (À) Electrochemical entrapment throughout polytyramine followed by covalent attachment EDC and NHS (À) Electrochemical entrapment of enzyme throughout polytyramine Without covalent attachment (À) SAM using thiol EDC and NHS (À) Covalent attachment onto the surface of polytyramine in humid conditions EDC or Glutaraldehyde () The concentrations of cofactors used to measure pyruvate in this study (2 mM TPP, 2 mM FAD and 1 mM MgCl 2 ) were consistent with previous reports for entrapped pyruvate oxidase [14,15,37]. The optimal pH in a buffer of 0.01 M Trizma and 0.04 M phosphate was found to be 7.2 in common with other studies [14,15].…”
Section: Enzyme Immobilization Methods Crosslinking Agents Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The optimal pH in a buffer of 0.01 M Trizma and 0.04 M phosphate was found to be 7.2 in common with other studies [14,15].…”
Section: Enzyme Immobilization Methods Crosslinking Agents Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The pH optimum for soluble and immobilized pyruvate oxidases were reported to be 7.0. 8 The color intensity of the indicator reaction using MBTH-DMA-peroxidase did not change over a pH range of 5-8. Therefore, pH 7.0 was selected for optimal enzyme reaction and maximal color intensity.…”
Section: Properties Of Immobilized Pyruvate Oxidase Columnmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Amperometric enzyme electrodes, in partiicular, have been studied because of their potential for (a high detection sensitivity and capability for analyzing colored or turbid solutions with inexpensive instrumentation [ I , 21. Significant attention has been focused on oxidase enzymes for the development of enzyme electrodes, and sensors have been developed for a variety of analytes including glucose [3], oxalate [4] and pyruvate [5]. In addition, amperometric immunoassays have been reported employing enzyme labels such as alkaline phosphatase and glucose oxidase [6, 71 capable of generating an electrochemically active product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%