2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.106147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of genetic variability, population structure and genetic differentiation of indigenous Turkish goat breeds based on SSR loci

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the goat breeds raised in China (Salles et al 2011;Guang-Xin et al 2015), lower inbreeding was detected in native Turkish goats via MHC-linked microsatellite markers. Similarly, low inbreeding was reported in previous microsatellite studies on native Turkish goats (Gül et al 2020;Karsli et al 2020;Tefiel et al 2020). As highlighted by Argun Karsli et al (2020), higher null allele frequency (> 0.2) may affect estimates of observed heterozygosity and inbreeding coefficient parameters.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Among Native Turkish Goat Populations Base...supporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the goat breeds raised in China (Salles et al 2011;Guang-Xin et al 2015), lower inbreeding was detected in native Turkish goats via MHC-linked microsatellite markers. Similarly, low inbreeding was reported in previous microsatellite studies on native Turkish goats (Gül et al 2020;Karsli et al 2020;Tefiel et al 2020). As highlighted by Argun Karsli et al (2020), higher null allele frequency (> 0.2) may affect estimates of observed heterozygosity and inbreeding coefficient parameters.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Among Native Turkish Goat Populations Base...supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Additionally, mean observed heterozygosity values for native Turkish goat populations were higher than the values reported for Xuhuai, Pashmina, Changthangi, Vendi, Galla, Small East African goat breeds (Salles et al 2011). On the other hand, higher genetic diversity was reported in previous studies conducted on native Turkish goats breeds in which Karsli et al (2020) used 20 microsatellite markers, while Gül et al (2020) preferred a total 22 microsatellite markers to reveal genetic structure of studied goat breeds. It is not surprising, since genetic diversity may increase by using more microsatellite markers with higher population size.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Among Native Turkish Goat Populations Base...contrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aforementioned methods are utilized for many purposes in farm animals, including revealing genetic origins (Upadhyay et al ., 2017), selection signatures (Guo et al ., 2018), genetic diversity (Demir and Balcioğlu, 2019), population structure (Karsli et al ., 2020), population difference (Ceccobelli et al ., 2020), detecting genes related to economically important traits (Wang et al ., 2021), identifying genes related to resistance/susceptibility to specific infectious diseases (Bermingham et al ., 2014), carrier animals of genetic diseases (Gebreselassie et al ., 2019), analyzing phylogenetic relationships (Özşensoy et al ., 2019), and conducting parentage testing (Keskin et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Advances In Molecular Genetics and Its Implications In Fawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honamli goat, which is de ned as a new breed by animal genetic resources, was taken under protection by the General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies in 2015 (Sozuer, 2019). After this development, it was reported that the phylogenetic similarity of Honamli and Hair goats to each other was over 85% and that these breeds could not be distinguished with the help of microsatellite markers (Bulut, et al, 2016;Karadag, 2016;Gumus, 2018;Karsli, et al, 2020;Gul, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%