2000
DOI: 10.1115/1.1369601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Friction Coefficient by Employing the Ring Compression Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, to recognize the influence of friction, smooth and rough anvils were used. The contact friction coefficient was calculated according to [27], through the ring compression tests which were carried out at room temperature. The friction coefficient by a shear model was calculated at 0.18, 0.35 for smooth and rough anvils, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, to recognize the influence of friction, smooth and rough anvils were used. The contact friction coefficient was calculated according to [27], through the ring compression tests which were carried out at room temperature. The friction coefficient by a shear model was calculated at 0.18, 0.35 for smooth and rough anvils, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male and Sofuoglu [8,9] developed this method which is well-accepted today to predict the friction coefficient in most metal forming processes at elevated temperature. In 2008, Ananthasayanam [10] used this method to determine the friction coefficient between L-BAL35 glass and a tungsten carbide DLC (Diamond-like-carbon) coated mold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, to verify the influence of friction, anvils with different roughnesses were used. The contact friction was determined through ring compression tests (at room temperature) and calculated according to the [22]. By the shear model, there was recognized friction of 0.18, 0.35 for smooth and rough anvil surfaces, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%