1977
DOI: 10.1080/00908317708945972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Forms of Sulfur in Coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28,29 The sulfidic sulfur content is then calculated from the 1:2 stoichiometry of FeS 2 . In other words, the inherent assumption in the method is that sulfide in coal exists as pyrite; therefore, the concentration of sulfide is dependent upon the iron content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 The sulfidic sulfur content is then calculated from the 1:2 stoichiometry of FeS 2 . In other words, the inherent assumption in the method is that sulfide in coal exists as pyrite; therefore, the concentration of sulfide is dependent upon the iron content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfur speciation analysis was conducted using the methods described by Shimp et al ( 1977 ) and Tuttle et al ( 1986 ). Sulfates were extracted from the shale with hydrochloric acid (6 M) and precipitated from the obtained solution by barium chloride (10 wt%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors in the pyritic or sulfate determinations will accumulate in the organic sulfur calculation for which no reliable independent method of analysis exists (15).…”
Section: Current Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%