2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2012.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of fluid-flow zones in a geothermal sandstone reservoir using thermal conductivity and temperature logs

Abstract: A methodology of locating fluid-flow zones in a rock formation is applied to the Buntsandstein sandstone reservoir of borehole EPS1, Soultz-sous-Forêts, France. The method is based on analysing thermal gradients determined by two different methods for a same cored borehole, (1) from temperature log and (2) from thermal conductivity measures. Comparing the two thermal-gradient datasets reveals the fluid-circulation zones in the borehole. Using this approach, we identified three main hot-fluid circulation zones … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluated porosity of the Buntsandstein is quite low (10% at the top of the formation and 20% for the Vosgian sandstones) (Vernoux et al 1995). Petrophysical studies of the core samples note the role of the matrix permeability, which controls the geothermal fluid circulation through these sandstones (Haffen et al 2013). The core sample exhibits a part of a fracture zone (1) and its damage zone (2).…”
Section: Geology Of the Sedimentary Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluated porosity of the Buntsandstein is quite low (10% at the top of the formation and 20% for the Vosgian sandstones) (Vernoux et al 1995). Petrophysical studies of the core samples note the role of the matrix permeability, which controls the geothermal fluid circulation through these sandstones (Haffen et al 2013). The core sample exhibits a part of a fracture zone (1) and its damage zone (2).…”
Section: Geology Of the Sedimentary Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies, especially laboratory studies that offer values of porosity and permeability, have targeted the overlying Permo-Triassic sedimentary units (e.g. Haffen et al 2013;Stober and Bucher 2015;Vidal et al 2015;Griffiths et al 2016). For example, Haffen et al (2013) estimated the permeability of the Buntsandstein sandstones of EPS-1 using a portable TinyPerm II permeameter and found that their permeability ranges from 10 −15 to 10 −13 m 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haffen et al 2013;Stober and Bucher 2015;Vidal et al 2015;Griffiths et al 2016). For example, Haffen et al (2013) estimated the permeability of the Buntsandstein sandstones of EPS-1 using a portable TinyPerm II permeameter and found that their permeability ranges from 10 −15 to 10 −13 m 2 . However, the laboratory measurements of Griffiths et al (2016) highlight that the permeability of Buntsandstein sandstones from EPS-1 can be lower than 10 −18 m 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of these two terms corresponds to the total source current density S j : (14) where u (in m· s −1 ) denotes the Darcy velocity, ˆV Q (in C· m −3 ) denotes the excess of electrical charge at saturation that is carried along with the flow of the pore water, σ denotes the (saturation-dependent) electrical conductivity of the porous material, and T C is the thermoelectric coupling coefficient defined below. For pH values between 5 and 8, Jardani et al [88] found that the ˆV Q is controlled by the permeability at saturation k (in m 2 ) and they developed the following empirical relationship [89]: 10 10 log 9.2 0.82log…”
Section: Self-potential Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such models require the knowledge of the parameters governing groundwater flow (e.g., hydraulic conductivity and specific storage) and heat transport (e.g., thermal conductivity, volumetric heat capacity, flow rate). In situ tests, such as thermal response tests [12,13] or laboratory measurements [14] are sometimes possible, but the values obtained may deliver only well-centered information or may not always (if not at all) be representative of in situ conditions at a larger scale. Such data are often scarce if not missing and authors often have to rely on standard calculation charts, values found in the literature, or simply default values implemented in standard software (e.g., [15][16][17][18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%