2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.07.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of fentanyl in biological and water samples using single-drop liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods using HPLC-UV, [12][13][14][15] GC-MS, 16) and LC-MS, [17][18][19][20][21][22] have been used to determine the fentanyl concentration in plasma [18][19][20]22) and breast milk. 21) Liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) provides a rapid, sensitive, and specific analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods using HPLC-UV, [12][13][14][15] GC-MS, 16) and LC-MS, [17][18][19][20][21][22] have been used to determine the fentanyl concentration in plasma [18][19][20]22) and breast milk. 21) Liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) provides a rapid, sensitive, and specific analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LLME that was reported previously is requiring pre-extraction and back-extraction method combined to the tedious micro-droplet acceptor phase, and takes 50 min for extraction procedure only [10], whereas this method using simple liquid extraction makes it the handiest method to perform, that takes 35 min to obtain the final peak on the chromatogram. With these qualities, this method can be used for FEN pharmacokinetic assessment in rats, FEN drug interactions studies and will give possible use for forensic purposes after slight modifications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods included different types of extraction procedures such as liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) utilizing hexane to extract target analytes [6,7], solid phase extraction (SPE) [9] and single-drop liquid-liquid-liquid micro-extraction (LLME) [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the interferences of co-extractives from urine sample, the acceptor phase drop was found unstable and easily lost during LLLME procedure. In order to diminish the matrix effect and consequently to improve the stability of droplet, the urine samples were diluted at 2:3 ratios with sodium hydroxide 0.5 mol/L [10,19]. The percent recovery was found in the range of 94.6 -101.0%.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%